Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39001795›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

Extraction of sleep information from clinical notes of Alzheimer's disease patients using natural language processing.

Sonish Sivarajkumar, Thomas Yu Chow Tam, Haneef Ahamed Mohammad, Samuel Viggiano, David Oniani, Shyam Visweswaran, Yanshan Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Precision sleep signatures to predict mental health outcomes in youth.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SDoH-GPT: using large language models to extract social determinants of health.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Automating Adjudication of Cardiovascular Events Using Large Language Models.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sonish SivarajkumarIntelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4173-1988
Thomas Yu Chow TamDepartment of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.
Haneef Ahamed MohammadDepartment of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.
Samuel ViggianoDepartment of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.
David OnianiDepartment of Health Information Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.
Shyam VisweswaranIntelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2079-8684
Yanshan WangIntelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
ENACT: Translating Health Informatics Tools to Research and Clinical Decision MakingU24TR004111 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STEVEN E REIS, SHYAM VISWESWARAN · 2022 to 2026
$23.3M
Closing the loop with an automatic referral population and summarization systemR01LM014306 · NLM · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Yifan Peng, Justin Frederick Rousseau · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS U24 TR004111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NIH HHS UL1TR001857NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014306University of Pittsburgh Momentum Funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAlzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia in the United States. Sleep is one of the lifestyle-related factors that has been shown critical for optimal cognitive function in old age. However, there is a lack of research studying the association between sleep and AD incidence. A major bottleneck for conducting such research is that the traditional way to acquire sleep information is time-consuming, inefficient, non-scalable, and limited to patients' subjective experience. We aim to automate the extraction of specific sleep-related patterns, such as snoring, napping, poor sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, night wakings, other sleep problems, and sleep duration, from clinical notes of AD patients. These sleep patterns are hypothesized to play a role in the incidence of AD, providing insight into the relationship between sleep and AD onset and progression. MATERIALS AND

methodsA gold standard dataset is created from manual annotation of 570 randomly sampled clinical note documents from the adSLEEP, a corpus of 192 000 de-identified clinical notes of 7266 AD patients retrieved from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). We developed a rule-based natural language processing (NLP) algorithm, machine learning models, and large language model (LLM)-based NLP algorithms to automate the extraction of sleep-related concepts, including snoring, napping, sleep problem, bad sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, night wakings, and sleep duration, from the gold standard dataset.

resultsThe annotated dataset of 482 patients comprised a predominantly White (89.2%), older adult population with an average age of 84.7 years, where females represented 64.1%, and a vast majority were non-Hispanic or Latino (94.6%). Rule-based NLP algorithm achieved the best performance of F1 across all sleep-related concepts. In terms of positive predictive value (PPV), the rule-based NLP algorithm achieved the highest PPV scores for daytime sleepiness (1.00) and sleep duration (1.00), while the machine learning models had the highest PPV for napping (0.95) and bad sleep quality (0.86), and LLAMA2 with finetuning had the highest PPV for night wakings (0.93) and sleep problem (0.89). DISCUSSION: Although sleep information is infrequently documented in the clinical notes, the proposed rule-based NLP algorithm and LLM-based NLP algorithms still achieved promising results. In comparison, the machine learning-based approaches did not achieve good results, which is due to the small size of sleep information in the training data.

conclusionThe results show that the rule-based NLP algorithm consistently achieved the best performance for all sleep concepts. This study focused on the clinical notes of patients with AD but could be extended to general sleep information extraction for other diseases.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseNatural Language ProcessingAgedDatasets as TopicElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleSleepSleep Wake DisordersAlzheimer’s diseaseclinical noteselectronic health recordsinformation extractionnatural language processingsleep

Identifiers

PMID39001795
PMCPMC11413436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.