Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39001679›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2024

Effect of nutrition-based prehabilitation on the postoperative outcomes of patients with esophagogastric cancer undergoing surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yi Shen, Zhuangzhuang Cong, Qiyue Ge, Hairong Huang, Wei Wei, Changyong Wang, Zhisheng Jiang, Yuheng Wu

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Clinical impact of CT-defined sarcopenia on long-term oncological outcomes in gastric cancer: validation of muscle mass cut-offs established according to EWGSOP recommendations.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Preoperative prehabilitation in adults: A concept analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yi ShenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Zhuangzhuang CongDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Qiyue GeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
Hairong HuangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Changyong WangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Zhisheng JiangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Yuheng WuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7907-7753

Funding

Medical Scientific Research Project of Jiangsu Health Commission ZD2021011National Natural Science Foundation of China 82002454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeta-analyses have primarily focused on the effects of exercise-based prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes and ignored the role of nutritional intervention. In this study, we filled this gap by investigating the effect of nutrition-based prehabilitation on the postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy and gastrectomy.

methodsFive electronic databases, namely, PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL, were searched. Adults diagnosed with esophagogastric cancer who were scheduled to undergo surgery and had undergone uni- or multimodal prehabilitation, with at least a week of mandatory nutritional intervention, were included. Forest plots were used to extract and visualize the data from the included studies. The occurrence of any postoperative complication was considered the primary endpoint.

resultsEight studies met the eligibility criteria, with five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three cohort studies. In total, 661 patients were included. Any prehabilitation, that is, unimodal (only nutrition) and multimodal prehabilitation, collectively decreased the risk of any postoperative complication by 23% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.66-0.90). A similar effect was exclusively observed for multimodal prehabilitation (risk ratio [RR] = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.66-0.93); however, it was not significant for unimodal prehabilitation. Any prehabilitation significantly decreased the length of hospital stay (LOS) (weighted mean difference = -0.77, 95% CI = -1.46 to -0.09).

conclusionsNutrition-based prehabilitation, particularly multimodal prehabilitation, confers protective effects against postoperative complications after esophagectomy and gastrectomy. Our findings suggest that prehabilitation slightly decreases LOS; however, the finding is not clinically significant. Therefore, additional rigorous RCTs are warranted for further substantiation.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyGastrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative ExerciseStomach NeoplasmsHumansLength of StayNutritional StatusPreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomeenhanced recovery after surgeryesophagogastric cancermeta‐analysisprehabilitationpreoperative exercisepreoperative nutrition

Identifiers

PMID39001679
PMCPMC11245637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.