ReviewBiomolecules & biomedicine2024
Review in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The emerging role of non-Gastroenterology report · 2026Review
- Cross-organ microbes modulate host upper gastrointestinal health and disease via the oral-gastric microbiome axis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- New perspectives on gastric disorders: the relationship between innate lymphoid cells and microbes in the stomach.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025Review
- A New Composite Integrative and Conjugative Element Mediates Multiple Drug Resistance fromInfection and drug resistance · 2025Article
- A Complicated Microbiology Diagnosis and Treatment of Tonsillopharyngitis in Pregnancy: A Case Report.Case reports in medicine · 2025Article
- Inflammatory factors collaboratively linkFrontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A wealth of research indicates that superficial gastritis (SG) and atrophic gastritis (AG) are precursors to gastric cancer (GC). While Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has long been recognized as a key player in GC development, recent findings by Fu et al. have identified Streptococcus anginosus (S. anginosus) as an emerging pathogen that can trigger SG, AG and GC. S. anginosus, a gram-positive coccus, leverages its surface protein T. pallidum membrane protein C (TMPC) to engage with the annexin A2 (ANXA2) receptor of gastric epithelial cells, facilitating its colonization and invasion in the gastric mucosa. This leads to an upregulation of proinflammatory chemokines Ccl20 and Ccl8, causing prolonged effects on gastric barrier function and microbiota homeostasis, leading to SG. Moreover, these bacteria activate the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway, which is associated with the development of AG and GC. Importantly, inhibiting TMPC or knocking down ANXA2 can reduce S. anginosus colonization and invasion, lowering the chances of SG, AG, and GC. This paper highlights the molecular mechanisms of S. anginosus in SG, AG and GC, emphasizing the importance of a multi-pathogen strategy in gastric disease management and the need for further investigation into the role of S. anginosus in GC progression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.