ArticleJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2024
A new computed tomography-based approach to quantify swallowing muscle volume by measuring tongue muscle area in a single slice.
Article in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relationship between Swallowing Muscle Mass and Tongue Muscle Strength and Endurance in Head and Neck Cancer Patients.Dysphagia · 2026Article
- Article
- Predictors of aspiration pneumonia in oral cavity cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy: A focus on skeletal muscle index.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value, sensitivity and specificity of CT, MRI, and PET in evaluation of cartilage invasion in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anemia, as an adverse event during chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer, contributes to a reduction in swallowing muscle mass and leads to dysphagia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Observational
- Artificial intelligence in dysphagia assessment: evaluating lingual muscle composition in head and neck cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Article
- Unveiling the relation between swallowing muscle mass and skeletal muscle mass in head and neck cancer patients.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- A new computed tomography-based approach to quantify swallowing muscle volume by measuring tongue muscle area in a single slice.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMeasuring the swallowing muscle mass with volume measurements is complex and time intensive; therefore, it is not used in clinical practice. However, it can be clinically relevant, for instance, in the case of sarcopenic dysphagia. The aim of the study was to develop a feasible and clinically applicable method to measure swallowing muscle mass.
methodsData from 10 head and neck cancer patients were collected from the Oncological Life Study data-biobank of the University Medical Center Groningen. The pharyngeal constrictor, genioglossus, mylohyoid and geniohyoid complex muscles, as well as the tongue complex muscles, were delineated manually on routinely performed head and neck computed tomography scans. Axial and sagittal planes were used for volume and area measurements, respectively. Muscle density measurements were performed with and without Hounsfield unit thresholding. Correlations were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficients, and interobserver reliability was measured using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).
resultsSignificant differences were observed between sagittal area measurements with and without Hounsfield unit thresholds for pharyngeal constrictor, tongue complex and the sum of the swallowing muscles (t > 6; P-value < 0.001). Stronger correlations emerged without Hounsfield unit thresholding. Strong positive and significant correlations were found between the total swallowing muscle mass volume and the sagittal area of the tongue complex muscles (r = 0.87, P-value < 0.05) and the sum of the sagittal areas of the pharyngeal constrictor and tongue complex muscles (r = 0.85, P-value < 0.05). The use of the Hounsfield unit threshold weakened correlations. Interobserver reliability was assessed and found to be fair to good for the pharyngeal constrictor muscle (ICC = 0.68, P-value < 0.05), excellent for the tongue complex muscles (ICC = 0.98, P-value < 0.05) and excellent for the total swallowing muscle area (ICC = 0.96, P-value < 0.05).
conclusionsSingle-slice delineation of the sagittal area of tongue complex muscle and pharyngeal constrictor muscle is a promising, fast, simple and clinically applicable method for measuring the total volume of the swallowing muscle mass in head and neck cancer patients without Hounsfield unit thresholding. These advancements and findings would help in the early and accurate diagnosis of definitive sarcopenic dysphagia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.