Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39001584›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2024

Newborn's neural representation of instrumental and vocal music as revealed by fMRI: A dynamic effective brain connectivity study.

Serafeim Loukas, Manuela Filippa, Joana Sa de Almeida, Andrew S Boehringer, Cristina Borradori Tolsa, Francisca Barcos-Munoz, Didier M Grandjean, Dimitri van de Ville, Petra S Hüppi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Serafeim LoukasDivision of Development and Growth, Department of Pediatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1878-7054
Manuela FilippaDivision of Development and Growth, Department of Pediatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1310-8008
Joana Sa de AlmeidaDivision of Development and Growth, Department of Pediatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Andrew S BoehringerDivision of Development and Growth, Department of Pediatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cristina Borradori TolsaDivision of Development and Growth, Department of Pediatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Francisca Barcos-MunozDivision of Pediatric Intensive Care and Neonatology, Department of Women, Children and Adolescents, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Didier M GrandjeanSwiss Center for Affective Sciences, Department of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Dimitri van de VilleInstitute of Bioengineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Petra S HüppiDivision of Development and Growth, Department of Pediatrics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7383-6648

Funding

Dora FoundationFondation Art-ThérapieFondation Prim'EnfanceFondation Recherche en périnatalité FRePSwiss National Science Foundation 324730-163084Swiss National Science Foundation 32473B_135817/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Music is ubiquitous, both in its instrumental and vocal forms. While speech perception at birth has been at the core of an extensive corpus of research, the origins of the ability to discriminate instrumental or vocal melodies is still not well investigated. In previous studies comparing vocal and musical perception, the vocal stimuli were mainly related to speaking, including language, and not to the non-language singing voice. In the present study, to better compare a melodic instrumental line with the voice, we used singing as a comparison stimulus, to reduce the dissimilarities between the two stimuli as much as possible, separating language perception from vocal musical perception. In the present study, 45 newborns were scanned, 10 full-term born infants and 35 preterm infants at term-equivalent age (mean gestational age at test = 40.17 weeks, SD = 0.44) using functional magnetic resonance imaging while listening to five melodies played by a musical instrument (flute) or sung by a female voice. To examine the dynamic task-based effective connectivity, we employed a psychophysiological interaction of co-activation patterns (PPI-CAPs) analysis, using the auditory cortices as seed region, to investigate moment-to-moment changes in task-driven modulation of cortical activity during an fMRI task. Our findings reveal condition-specific, dynamically occurring patterns of co-activation (PPI-CAPs). During the vocal condition, the auditory cortex co-activates with the sensorimotor and salience networks, while during the instrumental condition, it co-activates with the visual cortex and the superior frontal cortex. Our results show that the vocal stimulus elicits sensorimotor aspects of the auditory perception and is processed as a more salient stimulus while the instrumental condition activated higher-order cognitive and visuo-spatial networks. Common neural signatures for both auditory stimuli were found in the precuneus and posterior cingulate gyrus. Finally, this study adds knowledge on the dynamic brain connectivity underlying the newborns capability of early and specialized auditory processing, highlighting the relevance of dynamic approaches to study brain function in newborn populations.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionMagnetic Resonance ImagingMusicAcoustic StimulationBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMaleSingingVoiceinstrumental musicmusic perceptionnewbornsprematurityvocal music

Identifiers

PMID39001584
PMCPMC11245569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.