Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39001535›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Plasma Metabolome Signatures to Predict Responsiveness to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer.

Alex Ap Rosini Silva, Marcella R Cardoso, Danilo Cardoso de Oliveira, Pedro Godoy, Maria Cecília R Talarico, Junier Marrero Gutiérrez, Raquel M Rodrigues Peres, Lucas M de Carvalho, Natália Angelo da Silva Miyaguti, Luis O Sarian and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a metabolic perspective.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alex Ap Rosini SilvaMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Av. São Francisco de Assis, 218, Sala 211, Prédio 5, Bragança Paulista 12916900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6400-5201
Marcella R CardosoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083881, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9924-478X
Danilo Cardoso de OliveiraMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Av. São Francisco de Assis, 218, Sala 211, Prédio 5, Bragança Paulista 12916900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9719-7708
Pedro GodoyMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Av. São Francisco de Assis, 218, Sala 211, Prédio 5, Bragança Paulista 12916900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6419-6343
Maria Cecília R TalaricoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083881, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1646-9754
Junier Marrero GutiérrezMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Av. São Francisco de Assis, 218, Sala 211, Prédio 5, Bragança Paulista 12916900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7950-0363
Raquel M Rodrigues PeresMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Av. São Francisco de Assis, 218, Sala 211, Prédio 5, Bragança Paulista 12916900, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucas M de CarvalhoPost Graduate Program in Health Sciences, São Francisco University, Bragança Paulista 12916900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8766-0452
Natália Angelo da Silva MiyagutiMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Av. São Francisco de Assis, 218, Sala 211, Prédio 5, Bragança Paulista 12916900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4446-7924
Luis O SarianDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083881, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alessandra TataLaboratory of Experimental Chemistry, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Venezie (IZSVe), Viale Fiume 78, 36100 Vicenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0093-7242
Sophie F M DerchainDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic and Breast Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas (UNICAMP-Universidade Estadual de Campinas), Campinas 13083881, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1029-9993
Andreia M PorcariMS4Life Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry, Health Sciences Postgraduate Program, São Francisco University, Av. São Francisco de Assis, 218, Sala 211, Prédio 5, Bragança Paulista 12916900, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4244-8594

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 88887.504805/2020-00Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/04314-6National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 304544/2022-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has arisen as a treatment option for breast cancer (BC). However, the response to NACT is still unpredictable and dependent on cancer subtype. Metabolomics is a tool for predicting biomarkers and chemotherapy response. We used plasma to verify metabolomic alterations in BC before NACT, relating to clinical data.

methodsLiquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was performed on pre-NACT plasma from patients with BC (

resultsThe model composed of 19 identified metabolites effectively predicted NACT response for training/validation sets with high sensitivity (95.4%/93.3%), specificity (91.6%/100.0%), and accuracy (94.6%/94.7%). In both sets, the panel correctly classified 95% of resistant and 94% of sensitive females. Most compounds identified by the model were lipids and amino acids and revealed pathway alterations related to chemoresistance.

conclusionWe developed a model for predicting patient response to NACT. These metabolite panels allow clinical gain by building precision medicine strategies based on tumor stratification.

Indexed as

breast cancercancer biologydrug resistancemetabolomicsneoadjuvant chemotherapy response

Identifiers

PMID39001535
PMCPMC11240312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.