ArticleCancers2024
Canine Cancer Diagnostics by X-ray Diffraction of Claws.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The application of artificial intelligence in veterinary oncology: a scoping review.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Vitacrystallography: Appearance and Development of Cancer-Induced Structural Biomarkers in a Mouse Model.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Benign/Cancer Diagnostics Based on X-Ray Diffraction: Comparison of Data Analytics Approaches.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the results of X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements of the dogs' claws and show the feasibility of using this approach for early, non-invasive cancer detection. The obtained two-dimensional XRD patterns can be described by Fourier coefficients, which were calculated for the radial and circular (angular) directions. We analyzed these coefficients using the supervised learning algorithm, which implies optimization of the random forest classifier by using samples from the training group and following the calculation of mean cancer probability per patient for the blind dataset. The proposed algorithm achieved a balanced accuracy of 85% and ROC-AUC of 0.91 for a blind group of 68 dogs. The transition from samples to patients additionally improved the ROC-AUC by 10%. The best specificity and sensitivity values for 68 patients were 97.4% and 72.4%, respectively. We also found that the structural parameter (biomarker) most important for the diagnostics is the intermolecular distance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.