ArticleCancers2024
Outcome Prediction Using Multi-Modal Information: Integrating Large Language Model-Extracted Clinical Information and Image Analysis.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large Language Models in Colorectal Cancer Care and Clinical Decision Support: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating Wound Images and Clinical Text for Pressure Injury Assessment and Treatment Recommendation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Optimizing local control in the surgical management of bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Insufficient reporting quality in large language model studies in the field of radiology.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Implementing generative pretrained transformer models for text recognition tasks in safety data sheets.Annals of work exposures and health · 2026Article
- An External Validation Study on Two Pre-Trained Large Language Models for Multimodal Prognostication in Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancer: Integrating Clinical, Treatment, and Radiomic Data to Predict Survival Outcomes with Interpretable Reasoning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Trends and Trajectories in the Rise of Large Language Models in Radiology: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Evaluating the reliability of large language models for clinical data extraction in bladder cancer prognosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring multimodal large language models on transthoracic Echocardiogram (TTE) tasks for cardiovascular decision support.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Article
- Large Language Models in Medical Diagnostics: Scoping Review With Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Large language models in oncology: a review.BMJ oncology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence application in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer: advance, challenges, and opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Survival prediction post-cystectomy is essential for the follow-up care of bladder cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate artificial intelligence (AI)-large language models (LLMs) for extracting clinical information and improving image analysis, with an initial application involving predicting five-year survival rates of patients after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Data were retrospectively collected from medical records and CT urograms (CTUs) of bladder cancer patients between 2001 and 2020. Of 781 patients, 163 underwent chemotherapy, had pre- and post-chemotherapy CTUs, underwent radical cystectomy, and had an available post-surgery five-year survival follow-up. Five AI-LLMs (Dolly-v2, Vicuna-13b, Llama-2.0-13b, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4.0) were used to extract clinical descriptors from each patient's medical records. As a reference standard, clinical descriptors were also extracted manually. Radiomics and deep learning descriptors were extracted from CTU images. The developed multi-modal predictive model, CRD, was based on the clinical (C), radiomics (R), and deep learning (D) descriptors. The LLM retrieval accuracy was assessed. The performances of the survival predictive models were evaluated using AUC and Kaplan-Meier analysis. For the 163 patients (mean age 64 ± 9 years; M:F 131:32), the LLMs achieved extraction accuracies of 74%~87% (Dolly), 76%~83% (Vicuna), 82%~93% (Llama), 85%~91% (GPT-3.5), and 94%~97% (GPT-4.0). For a test dataset of 64 patients, the CRD model achieved AUCs of 0.89 ± 0.04 (manually extracted information), 0.87 ± 0.05 (Dolly), 0.83 ± 0.06~0.84 ± 0.05 (Vicuna), 0.81 ± 0.06~0.86 ± 0.05 (Llama), 0.85 ± 0.05~0.88 ± 0.05 (GPT-3.5), and 0.87 ± 0.05~0.88 ± 0.05 (GPT-4.0). This study demonstrates the use of LLM model-extracted clinical information, in conjunction with imaging analysis, to improve the prediction of clinical outcomes, with bladder cancer as an initial example.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.