Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39001361›Full record

ArticleCancers2024

Cadherin Expression Profiles Define Glioblastoma Differentiation and Patient Prognosis.

Carolina Noronha, Ana Sofia Ribeiro, Rita Carvalho, Nuno Mendes, Joaquim Reis, Claudia C Faria, Ricardo Taipa, Joana Paredes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carolina NoronhaNeurosurgery Department, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4050-366 Porto, Portugal.
Ana Sofia RibeiroCancer Metastasis, i3S, Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9698-9233
Rita CarvalhoCancer Metastasis, i3S, Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4021-3145
Nuno MendesIPATIMUP-Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0570-2277
Joaquim ReisNeurosurgery Department, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário do Porto, 4050-366 Porto, Portugal.
Claudia C FariaNeurosurgery Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1259-9922
Ricardo TaipaNeuropathology Department, Hospital de Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, 4050-342 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9260-0227
Joana ParedesCancer Metastasis, i3S, Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1076-1343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cadherins are cell-cell adhesion proteins which have been strongly implicated in cancer invasion, dissemination and metastasis capacity; thus, they are key players in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) program. However, their role in glioblastoma (GBM), a primary central nervous system aggressive tumor, remains to be clarified. N-, E- and P-cadherin expression was analyzed on a large series of GBMs, characterized with clinical, imaging and neuropathological parameters, as well as with patients' survival data. In addition, cadherins' expression was studied in match-recurrent cases. Using TCGA data, cadherin expression profiles were also evaluated according to GBM transcription subtypes. N-cadherin expression was observed in 81.5% of GBM, followed by E-cadherin in 31% and P-cadherin in 20.8%. Upon tumor recurrence, P-cadherin was the only significantly upregulated cadherin compared with the primary tumor, being positive in 65.8% of the cases. Actually, P-cadherin gain was observed in 51.4% of matched primary-recurrent cases. Cadherins' co-expression was also explored. Interestingly, E- and N-cadherin co-expression identified a GBM subgroup with frequent epithelial differentiation and a significant survival benefit. On the other hand, subgroups with P-cadherin expression carried the worse prognosis. P- and N-cadherin co-expression correlated with the presence of a mesenchymal phenotype. Expressions of isolated P-cadherin or E- and P-cadherin co-expression were associated with imaging characteristics of aggressiveness, to highly heterogeneous tumors, an d to worse patient survival. Classical cadherins co-expression subgroups present consistent clinical, imaging, neuropathological and survival differences, which probably reflect different states of an EMT-like program in GBM.

Indexed as

E-cadherinEMTglioblastomaN-cadherinP-cadherin

Identifiers

PMID39001361
PMCPMC11240393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.