ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Aspects of Occlusal Recordings Performed with the T-Scan System and with the Medit Intraoral Scanner.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Paper to Pixels-A Narrative Review of Occlusal Analysis.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Comparative Analysis of Mandibular Kinematics Recorded with Zebris JMA and Medit i700 Using an Open-Source 3D Model-Based Framework.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Occlusal force analysis with T-Scan and Innobyte in adult patients: a prospective study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Occlusal Force Changes in Growing Patients Treated with the Three Bite Plane Appliance: A Prospective Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Occlusal Overload and Periodontitis: Integrating Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Emerging Perspectives-A Scoping Review.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
- Assessment of Occlusal Contacts Recorded with the Medit Intraoral Scanner vs. Exocad Software.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- Comparison of occlusal force distribution and digital occlusal analysis methods of single posterior implant restorations: an in vivo study.BMC oral health · 2025Observational
- Insights into Occlusal Analysis: Articulating Paper versus Digital Devices.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDental occlusion refers to the static and dynamic relationships that are established between the teeth of the two arches and is an important factor in the homeostasis of the dento-maxillary system. The objective of the present study was to compare two digital occlusal analysis systems: the T-Scan III system and the Medit I600 intraoral scanner. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe study was carried out on 20 students from the Faculty of Dental Medicine Craiova, whose dental occlusion was assessed with the T-Scan III system and with the Medit I600 intraoral scanner. Dental occlusion was assessed in the maximum intercuspation position, the edge-to-edge protrusion position, and the edge-to-edge position in right and left laterotrusion. The images of the 2D occlusal contact areas obtained by both methods were converted to .jpeg format and then transferred to Adobe Photoshop CS6 2021 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) for comparison. The recorded data were statistically processed.
resultsAnalyzing the data provided by the two digital occlusal analysis systems, it was found that the T-Scan III system provided data related to the amplitude of the occlusal forces, the surface on which they were distributed (the contact surface), the dynamics of the occlusal contacts, and the proportion in which they were distributed at the level of the two hemiarches, and the Medit I600 intraoral scanner performed an evaluation of the occlusal interface of the two arches, highlighting the extent of the contact areas with the degree of overlapping of the occlusal components. Although both methods of occlusal analysis recorded the highest values for the maximum intercuspation position, the results could not be compared.
conclusionsThe two digital systems provide different data in occlusal analysis. As the T-Scan III system is considered the gold standard for occlusal analysis, more studies are needed to understand the data provided by the Medit I600 intraoral scanner and their significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.