Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39001346›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evolving and Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Imaging.

Jin Y Chang, Mina S Makary

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07744555 (Change in the Proportion of Correct Interpretations of Pulmonary Opacities by General Practitioners Using an Expert System), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07744555 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Change in the Proportion of Correct Interpretations of Pulmonary Opacities by General Practitioners Using an Expert System

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de la SabanaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled50ConditionsPneumonia, RadiographyArmsArtificial intelligence expert system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jin Y ChangDepartment of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Mina S MakaryDepartment of Radiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2498-7132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing medicine, particularly radiology. With the development of newer models, AI applications are demonstrating improved performance and versatile utility in the clinical setting. Thoracic imaging is an area of profound interest, given the prevalence of chest imaging and the significant health implications of thoracic diseases. This review aims to highlight the promising applications of AI within thoracic imaging. It examines the role of AI, including its contributions to improving diagnostic evaluation and interpretation, enhancing workflow, and aiding in invasive procedures. Next, it further highlights the current challenges and limitations faced by AI, such as the necessity of 'big data', ethical and legal considerations, and bias in representation. Lastly, it explores the potential directions for the application of AI in thoracic radiology.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)deep learning (DL)machine learning (ML)thorax

Identifiers

PMID39001346
PMCPMC11240935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.