ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Utilizing Deep Learning for Diagnosing Radicular Cysts.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Odontogenous Cysts and Ameloblastomas-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A deep learning approach based on YOLO v11 for automatic detection of jaw cysts.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence Methods in the Detection of Oral Diseases on Pantomographic Images-A Systematic Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A novel deep learning-based model for automated tooth detection and numbering in mixed and permanent dentition in occlusal photographs.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning algorithm capable of diagnosing radicular cysts in the lower jaw on panoramic radiographs. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of 138 radicular cysts and 100 normal panoramic radiographs collected from 2013 to 2023 at Clinical Hospital Dubrava. The images were annotated by a team comprising a radiologist and a maxillofacial surgeon, utilizing the GNU Image Manipulation Program. Furthermore, the dataset was enriched through the application of various augmentation techniques to improve its robustness. The evaluation of the algorithm's performance and a deep dive into its mechanics were achieved using performance metrics and EigenCAM maps.
resultsIn the task of diagnosing radicular cysts, the initial algorithm performance-without the use of augmentation techniques-yielded the following scores: precision at 85.8%, recall at 66.7%, mean average precision (mAP)@50 threshold at 70.9%, and mAP@50-95 thresholds at 60.2%. The introduction of image augmentation techniques led to the precision of 74%, recall of 77.8%, mAP@50 threshold to 89.6%, and mAP@50-95 thresholds of 71.7, respectively. Also, the precision and recall were transformed into F1 scores to provide a balanced evaluation of model performance. The weighted function of these metrics determined the overall efficacy of our models. In our evaluation, non-augmented data achieved F1 scores of 0.750, while augmented data achieved slightly higher scores of 0.758.
conclusionOur study underscores the pivotal role that deep learning is poised to play in the future of oral and maxillofacial radiology. Furthermore, the algorithm developed through this research demonstrates a capability to diagnose radicular cysts accurately, heralding a significant advancement in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.