Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39001331›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Latent Diffusion Models with Image-Derived Annotations for Enhanced AI-Assisted Cancer Diagnosis in Histopathology.

Pedro Osorio, Guillermo Jimenez-Perez, Javier Montalt-Tordera, Jens Hooge, Guillem Duran-Ballester, Shivam Singh, Moritz Radbruch, Ute Bach, Sabrina Schroeder, Krystyna Siudak and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pedro OsorioDecision Science & Advanced Analytics, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-8848-0214
Guillermo Jimenez-PerezDecision Science & Advanced Analytics, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2281-107X
Javier Montalt-TorderaDecision Science & Advanced Analytics, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1956-1409
Jens HoogeDecision Science & Advanced Analytics, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2667-6490
Guillem Duran-BallesterDecision Science & Advanced Analytics, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Shivam SinghDecision Science & Advanced Analytics, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Moritz RadbruchPathology and Clinical Pathology, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Ute BachPathology and Clinical Pathology, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2523-1943
Sabrina SchroederPathology and Clinical Pathology, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Krystyna SiudakPathology and Clinical Pathology, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Julia VienenkoetterPathology and Clinical Pathology, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Bettina LawrenzPathology and Clinical Pathology, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Sadegh MohammadiDecision Science & Advanced Analytics, Bayer AG, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based image analysis has immense potential to support diagnostic histopathology, including cancer diagnostics. However, developing supervised AI methods requires large-scale annotated datasets. A potentially powerful solution is to augment training data with synthetic data. Latent diffusion models, which can generate high-quality, diverse synthetic images, are promising. However, the most common implementations rely on detailed textual descriptions, which are not generally available in this domain. This work proposes a method that constructs structured textual prompts from automatically extracted image features. We experiment with the PCam dataset, composed of tissue patches only loosely annotated as healthy or cancerous. We show that including image-derived features in the prompt, as opposed to only healthy and cancerous labels, improves the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID) by 88.6. We also show that pathologists find it challenging to detect synthetic images, with a median sensitivity/specificity of 0.55/0.55. Finally, we show that synthetic data effectively train AI models.

Indexed as

AI in health carecancer detectiondiffusion modelsdigital healthgenerative AIhistopathologymedical imagingsynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID39001331
PMCPMC11241396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.