Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39001253›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Diagnostic Benefits and Surgical Implications of Methods for Tumor Localization in Sigmoid and Rectum Tumors.

Mehmet Onur Gul, Mehmet Akcicek, Nidal Iflazoglu, Kadir Corbaci, Cuma Ali Emir, Mehmet Guzel, Cem Kaan Parsak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mehmet Onur GulSurgical Oncology Clinic, Malatya Training Research Hospital, 44000 Malatya, Turkey.
Mehmet AkcicekFaculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Malatya Turgut Özal University, 44000 Malatya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0232-1284
Nidal IflazogluSurgical Oncology Clinic, Bursa City Hospital, 16110 Bursa, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7727-602X
Kadir CorbaciGeneral Surgery, Osmaneli Mustafa Selahattin Çetintaş State Hospital, 11500 Bilecik, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-4798
Cuma Ali EmirSurgical Oncology Clinic, Malatya Training Research Hospital, 44000 Malatya, Turkey.
Mehmet GuzelGastroenterology Surgery, Malatya Training Research Hospital, 44000 Malatya, Turkey.
Cem Kaan ParsakFaculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology, Cukurova University, 01330 Adana, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: In our study, we aimed to determine the accuracy rates of imaging methods for sigmoid, rectosigmoid colon, and rectum cancer. (2) Methods: Patients with tumors located in the rectosigmoid colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum who were operated on were included. Upon admission, we examined the patients' first diagnostic colonoscopies and their preoperative repeat control colonoscopies and computed tomography (CT) report. (3) Results: In this study, 23 patients (57.5%) were male. The overall accuracy rates were 80.0% (32/40) in colonoscopy, 65.0% (26/40) in preoperative CT, and 87.5% (35/40) in retro CT, and the differences among the examination methods were statistically significant (

Indexed as

colon cancercolonoscopycomputed tomographyrectum cancertumor localization

Identifiers

PMID39001253
PMCPMC11240799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.