ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Augmenting Radiological Diagnostics with AI for Tuberculosis and COVID-19 Disease Detection: Deep Learning Detection of Chest Radiographs.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI in Medical Imaging and Image Processing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Dyslipidemia Care.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this research, we introduce a network that can identify pneumonia, COVID-19, and tuberculosis using X-ray images of patients' chests. The study emphasizes tuberculosis, COVID-19, and healthy lung conditions, discussing how advanced neural networks, like VGG16 and ResNet50, can improve the detection of lung issues from images. To prepare the images for the model's input requirements, we enhanced them through data augmentation techniques for training purposes. We evaluated the model's performance by analyzing the precision, recall, and F1 scores across training, validation, and testing datasets. The results show that the ResNet50 model outperformed VGG16 with accuracy and resilience. It displayed superior ROC AUC values in both validation and test scenarios. Particularly impressive were ResNet50's precision and recall rates, nearing 0.99 for all conditions in the test set. On the hand, VGG16 also performed well during testing-detecting tuberculosis with a precision of 0.99 and a recall of 0.93. Our study highlights the performance of our deep learning method by showcasing the effectiveness of ResNet50 over traditional approaches like VGG16. This progress utilizes methods to enhance classification accuracy by augmenting data and balancing them. This positions our approach as an advancement in using state-of-the-art deep learning applications in imaging. By enhancing the accuracy and reliability of diagnosing ailments such as COVID-19 and tuberculosis, our models have the potential to transform care and treatment strategies, highlighting their role in clinical diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.