ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Automatic Segmentation of Type A Aortic Dissection on Computed Tomography Images Using Deep Learning Approach.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal imaging of acquired aortic diseases: clinical efficacy, comparative analysis, and future perspectives.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Segmentation and diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tear using deep learning and radiomics based on knee CT.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Performance of image-based deep learning models for aortic dissection segmentation and diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in aortic CT angiography: current applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeType A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening aortic disease. The tear involves the ascending aorta and progresses into the separation of the layers of the aortic wall and the occurrence of a false lumen. Accurate segmentation of TAAD could provide assistance for disease assessment and guidance for clinical treatment.
methodsThis study applied nnU-Net, a state-of-the-art biomedical segmentation network architecture, to segment contrast-enhanced CT images and quantify the morphological features for TAAD. CT datasets were acquired from 24 patients with TAAD. Manual segmentation and annotation of the CT images was used as the ground-truth. Two-dimensional (2D) nnU-Net and three-dimensional (3D) nnU-Net architectures with Dice- and cross entropy-based loss functions were utilized to segment the true lumen (TL), false lumen (FL), and intimal flap on the images. Four-fold cross validation was performed to evaluate the performance of the two nnU-Net architectures. Six metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, Intersection of Union, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Hausdorff distance, were calculated to evaluate the performance of the 2D and 3D nnU-Net algorithms in TAAD datasets. Aortic morphological features from both 2D and 3D nnU-Net algorithms were quantified based on the segmented results and compared.
resultsOverall, 3D nnU-Net architectures had better performance in TAAD CT datasets, with TL and FL segmentation accuracy up to 99.9%. The DSCs of TLs and FLs based on the 3D nnU-Net were 88.42% and 87.10%. For the aortic TL and FL diameters, the FL area calculated from the segmentation results of the 3D nnU-Net architecture had smaller relative errors (3.89-6.80%), compared to the 2D nnU-Net architecture (relative errors: 4.35-9.48%).
conclusionsThe nnU-Net architectures may serve as a basis for automatic segmentation and quantification of TAAD, which could aid in rapid diagnosis, surgical planning, and subsequent biomechanical simulation of the aorta.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.