Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39001211›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Reproducibility of Portable OCT and Comparison with Conventional OCT.

Marie Nakamura, Takao Hirano, Yoshiaki Chiku, Yoshiaki Takahashi, Hideki Miyasaka, Shinji Kakihara, Ken Hoshiyama, Toshinori Murata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marie NakamuraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.
Takao HiranoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3601-8053
Yoshiaki ChikuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.
Yoshiaki TakahashiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.
Hideki MiyasakaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.
Shinji KakiharaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8433-8169
Ken HoshiyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.
Toshinori MurataDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto 390-8621, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an indispensable instrument in ophthalmology; however, some facilities lack permanent OCT devices. ACT100, a portable SD-OCT system, allows for medical examinations at hospitals that do not have OCT and house calls. We investigated the usefulness of ACT100 by examining the reproducibility of retinal thickness measurements in 35 healthy participants with normal eyes using ACT100 and Cirrus. Using two OCTs, the OCT imaging of both eyes of each subject was performed. Macular retinal thickness was evaluated using the average value in nine lesions of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) circle. Both models captured images in all cases. In the right eye, mean retinal thickness was significantly lower than in the ACT100 group in all regions; however, the measured values correlated well. The intraclass correlation coefficients showed the same high reliability as the Cirrus. The coefficients of variation (CVs) of both models showed little variation and high stability; however, the CV of ACT100 was significantly higher. The left eye was almost identical. Macular retinal thickness measured using ACT100 showed slightly greater variability than that by Cirrus; the reproducibility was good and correlated well with that of Cirrus. This technique is a suitable alternative to conventional OCT.

Indexed as

mean retinal thicknessoptical coherence tomography (OCT)portable

Identifiers

PMID39001211
PMCPMC11240703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.