ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Study on Graph Optimization Method for GNSS/IMU Integrated Navigation System Based on Virtual Constraints.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In GNSS/IMU integrated navigation systems, factors like satellite occlusion and non-line-of-sight can degrade satellite positioning accuracy, thereby impacting overall navigation system results. To tackle this challenge and leverage historical pseudorange information effectively, this paper proposes a graph optimization-based GNSS/IMU model with virtual constraints. These virtual constraints in the graph model are derived from the satellite's position from the previous time step, the rate of change of pseudoranges, and ephemeris data. This virtual constraint serves as an alternative solution for individual satellites in cases of signal anomalies, thereby ensuring the integrity and continuity of the graph optimization model. Additionally, this paper conducts an analysis of the graph optimization model based on these virtual constraints, comparing it with traditional graph models of GNSS/IMU and SLAM. The marginalization of the graph model involving virtual constraints is analyzed next. The experiment was conducted on a set of real-world data, and the results of the proposed method were compared with tightly coupled Kalman filtering and the original graph optimization method. In instantaneous performance testing, the method maintains an RMSE error within 5% compared with real pseudorange measurement, while in a continuous performance testing scenario with no available GNSS signal, the method shows approximately a 30% improvement in horizontal RMSE accuracy over the traditional graph optimization method during a 10-second period. This demonstrates the method's potential for practical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.