ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Computer Vision Method for Automatic Detection of Microstructure Defects of Concrete.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developing Computer Vision Models for Classifying Grain Shapes of Crushed Stone.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The search for structural and microstructural defects using simple human vision is associated with significant errors in determining voids, large pores, and violations of the integrity and compactness of particle packing in the micro- and macrostructure of concrete. Computer vision methods, in particular convolutional neural networks, have proven to be reliable tools for the automatic detection of defects during visual inspection of building structures. The study's objective is to create and compare computer vision algorithms that use convolutional neural networks to identify and analyze damaged sections in concrete samples from different structures. Networks of the following architectures were selected for operation: U-Net, LinkNet, and PSPNet. The analyzed images are photos of concrete samples obtained by laboratory tests to assess the quality in terms of the defection of the integrity and compactness of the structure. During the implementation process, changes in quality metrics such as macro-averaged precision, recall, and F1-score, as well as IoU (Jaccard coefficient) and accuracy, were monitored. The best metrics were demonstrated by the U-Net model, supplemented by the cellular automaton algorithm: precision = 0.91, recall = 0.90, F1 = 0.91, IoU = 0.84, and accuracy = 0.90. The developed segmentation algorithms are universal and show a high quality in highlighting areas of interest under any shooting conditions and different volumes of defective zones, regardless of their localization. The automatization of the process of calculating the damage area and a recommendation in the "critical/uncritical" format can be used to assess the condition of concrete of various types of structures, adjust the formulation, and change the technological parameters of production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.