ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Current Diagnostic Techniques for Pneumonia: A Scoping Review.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Generation Bionic Sensors for Small Molecule Detection: Integrating Synthetic Biology, Nanomaterials, and Artificial Intelligence.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Clinical assessment and biomarkers for the detection of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia in children and adults: a protocol for systematic review of diagnostic accuracy.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- Article
- Mobile phone auscultation to delineate pneumonia from other respiratory conditions and controls: a prospective cohort study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Human beta defensins 3 and 6 serve as diagnostic tools for identifying sepsis and pneumonia.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods Developed for Prediction and Diagnosis of Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.Health science reports · 2025Review
- Efficient and Accurate Pneumonia Detection Using a Novel Multi-Scale Transformer Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Rapid, season-specific PCR testing versus traditional diagnostics for pneumonia in the emergency department.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-acquired pneumonia is one of the most lethal infectious diseases, especially for infants and the elderly. Given the variety of causative agents, the accurate early detection of pneumonia is an active research area. To the best of our knowledge, scoping reviews on diagnostic techniques for pneumonia are lacking. In this scoping review, three major electronic databases were searched and the resulting research was screened. We categorized these diagnostic techniques into four classes (i.e., lab-based methods, imaging-based techniques, acoustic-based techniques, and physiological-measurement-based techniques) and summarized their recent applications. Major research has been skewed towards imaging-based techniques, especially after COVID-19. Currently, chest X-rays and blood tests are the most common tools in the clinical setting to establish a diagnosis; however, there is a need to look for safe, non-invasive, and more rapid techniques for diagnosis. Recently, some non-invasive techniques based on wearable sensors achieved reasonable diagnostic accuracy that could open a new chapter for future applications. Consequently, further research and technology development are still needed for pneumonia diagnosis using non-invasive physiological parameters to attain a better point of care for pneumonia patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.