ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Rainfall Observation Leveraging Raindrop Sounds Acquired Using Waterproof Enclosure: Exploring Optimal Length of Sounds for Frequency Analysis.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel method to estimate rainfall intensity by analyzing the sound of raindrops. An innovative device for collecting acoustic data was designed, capable of blocking ambient noise in rainy environments. The device was deployed in real rainfall conditions during both the monsoon season and non-monsoon season to record raindrop sounds. The collected raindrop sounds were divided into 1 s, 10 s, and 1 min intervals, and the performance of rainfall intensity estimation for each segment length was compared. First, the rainfall occurrence was determined based on four extracted frequency domain features (average of dB, frequency-weighted average of dB, standard deviation of dB, and highest frequency), followed by a quantitative estimation of the rainfall intensity for the periods in which rainfall occurred. The results indicated that the best estimation performance was achieved when using 10 s segments, corresponding to the following metrics: accuracy: 0.909, false alarm ratio: 0.099, critical success index: 0.753, precision: 0.901, recall: 0.821, and F1 score: 0.859 for rainfall occurrence classification; and root mean square error: 1.675 mm/h, R2: 0.798, and mean absolute error: 0.493 mm/h for quantitative rainfall intensity estimation. The proposed small and lightweight device is convenient to install and manage and is remarkably cost-effective compared with traditional rainfall observation equipment. Additionally, this compact rainfall acoustic collection device can facilitate the collection of detailed rainfall information over vast areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.