ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Retinal Vessel Segmentation Method Based on the Sharpness-Aware Minimization Model.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimising Generalisable Deep Learning Models for CT Coronary Segmentation: A Multifactorial Evaluation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- GCSAM: Gradient Centralized Sharpness Aware Minimization.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2025Article
- TW-YOLO: An Innovative Blood Cell Detection Model Based on Multi-Scale Feature Fusion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Retinal vessel segmentation is crucial for diagnosing and monitoring various eye diseases such as diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, and hypertension. In this study, we examine how sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) can improve RF-UNet's generalization performance. RF-UNet is a novel model for retinal vessel segmentation. We focused our experiments on the digital retinal images for vessel extraction (DRIVE) dataset, which is a benchmark for retinal vessel segmentation, and our test results show that adding SAM to the training procedure leads to notable improvements. Compared to the non-SAM model (training loss of 0.45709 and validation loss of 0.40266), the SAM-trained RF-UNet model achieved a significant reduction in both training loss (0.094225) and validation loss (0.08053). Furthermore, compared to the non-SAM model (training accuracy of 0.90169 and validation accuracy of 0.93999), the SAM-trained model demonstrated higher training accuracy (0.96225) and validation accuracy (0.96821). Additionally, the model performed better in terms of sensitivity, specificity, AUC, and F1 score, indicating improved generalization to unseen data. Our results corroborate the notion that SAM facilitates the learning of flatter minima, thereby improving generalization, and are consistent with other research highlighting the advantages of advanced optimization methods. With wider implications for other medical imaging tasks, these results imply that SAM can successfully reduce overfitting and enhance the robustness of retinal vessel segmentation models. Prospective research avenues encompass verifying the model on vaster and more diverse datasets and investigating its practical implementation in real-world clinical situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.