ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Bridging Convolutional Neural Networks and Transformers for Efficient Crack Detection in Concrete Building Structures.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart City Infrastructure Monitoring with a Hybrid Vision Transformer for Micro-Crack Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bearing fault diagnosis based on efficient cross space multiscale CNN transformer parallelism.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Road manhole cover defect detection via multi-scale edge enhancement and feature aggregation pyramid.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhance the Concrete Crack Classification Based on a Novel Multi-Stage YOLOV10-ViT Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting cracks in building structures is an essential practice that ensures safety, promotes longevity, and maintains the economic value of the built environment. In the past, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques have been used to enhance classification accuracy. However, the conventional CNN (convolutional neural network) methods incur high computational costs owing to their extensive number of trainable parameters and tend to extract only high-dimensional shallow features that may not comprehensively represent crack characteristics. We proposed a novel convolution and composite attention transformer network (CCTNet) model to address these issues. CCTNet enhances crack identification by processing more input pixels and combining convolution channel attention with window-based self-attention mechanisms. This dual approach aims to leverage the localized feature extraction capabilities of CNNs with the global contextual understanding afforded by self-attention mechanisms. Additionally, we applied an improved cross-attention module within CCTNet to increase the interaction and integration of features across adjacent windows. The performance of CCTNet on the Historical Building Crack2019, SDTNET2018, and proposed DS3 has a precision of 98.60%, 98.93%, and 99.33%, respectively. Furthermore, the training validation loss of the proposed model is close to zero. In addition, the AUC (area under the curve) is 0.99 and 0.98 for the Historical Building Crack2019 and SDTNET2018, respectively. CCTNet not only outperforms existing methodologies but also sets a new standard for the accurate, efficient, and reliable detection of cracks in building structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.