Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39001028›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Cooperative Communication Based Protocols for Underwater Wireless Sensors Networks: A Review.

Muhammad Shoaib Khan, Andrea Petroni, Mauro Biagi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammad Shoaib KhanDepartment of Information, Electronics and Telecommunications (DIET) Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8173-8378
Andrea PetroniFondazione Ugo Bordoni (FUB), Viale America 201, 00144 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5271-9373
Mauro BiagiDepartment of Information, Electronics and Telecommunications (DIET) Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana 18, 00184 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4830-2641

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Underwater wireless sensor networks are gaining popularity since supporting a broad range of applications, both military and civilian. Wireless acoustics is the most widespread technology adopted in underwater networks, the realization of which must face several challenges induced by channel propagation like signal attenuation, multipath and latency. In order to address such issues, the attention of researchers has recently focused on the concept of cooperative communication and networking, borrowed from terrestrial systems and to be conveniently recast in the underwater scenario. In this paper, we present a comprehensive literature review about cooperative underwater wireless sensor networks, investigating how nodes cooperation can be exploited at the different levels of the network protocol stack. Specifically, we review the diversity techniques employable at the physical layer, error and medium access control link layer protocols, and routing strategies defined at the network layer. We also provide numerical results and performance comparisons among the most widespread approaches. Finally, we present the current and future trends in cooperative underwater networks, considering the use of machine learning algorithms to efficiently manage the different aspects of nodes cooperation.

Indexed as

cooperative communicationcooperative error controlcooperative routingunderwater wireless sensor networks

Identifiers

PMID39001028
PMCPMC11244465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.