ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
A Within-Subject Multimodal NIRS-EEG Classifier for Infant Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Cradle to Early-Life Sleep: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research on Neonatal Sleep.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- Multimodal fNIRS-EEG sensor fusion: Review of data-driven methods and perspective for naturalistic brain imaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Developmental origins of natural sound perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) and Electroencephalography (EEG) are commonly employed neuroimaging methods in developmental neuroscience. Since they offer complementary strengths and their simultaneous recording is relatively easy, combining them is highly desirable. However, to date, very few infant studies have been conducted with NIRS-EEG, partly because analyzing and interpreting multimodal data is challenging. In this work, we propose a framework to carry out a multivariate pattern analysis that uses an NIRS-EEG feature matrix, obtained by selecting EEG trials presented within larger NIRS blocks, and combining the corresponding features. Importantly, this classifier is intended to be sensitive enough to apply to individual-level, and not group-level data. We tested the classifier on NIRS-EEG data acquired from five newborn infants who were listening to human speech and monkey vocalizations. We evaluated how accurately the model classified stimuli when applied to EEG data alone, NIRS data alone, or combined NIRS-EEG data. For three out of five infants, the classifier achieved high and statistically significant accuracy when using features from the NIRS data alone, but even higher accuracy when using combined EEG and NIRS data, particularly from both hemoglobin components. For the other two infants, accuracies were lower overall, but for one of them the highest accuracy was still achieved when using combined EEG and NIRS data with both hemoglobin components. We discuss how classification based on joint NIRS-EEG data could be modified to fit the needs of different experimental paradigms and needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.