Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39000933›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Research on the Influence of Core Sensing Components on the Performance of Galvanic Dissolved Oxygen Sensors.

Helai Liu, Lingfeng Zhang, Ye Wu, Weimin Ding, Yutao Liu, Sanqin Zhao, Jiabing Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Helai LiuCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Lingfeng ZhangCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Ye WuCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Weimin DingCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Yutao LiuCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Sanqin ZhaoCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Jiabing GuCollege of Engineering, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 2019YFC1906104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The galvanic dissolved oxygen sensor finds widespread applications in multiple critical fields due to its high precision and excellent stability. As its core sensing components, the oxygen-permeable membrane, electrode, and electrolyte significantly impact the sensor's performance. To systematically investigate the comprehensive effects of these core sensing components on the performance of galvanic dissolved oxygen sensors, this study selected six types of oxygen-permeable membranes made from two materials (Perfluoroalkoxy Polymer (PFA) and Fluorinated Ethylene Propylene Copolymer (FEP)) with three thicknesses (0.015 mm, 0.03 mm, and 0.05 mm). Additionally, five concentrations of KCl electrolyte were configured, and four different proportions of lead-tin alloy electrodes were chosen. Single-factor and crossover experiments were conducted using the OxyGuard dissolved oxygen sensor as the experimental platform. The experimental results indicate that under the same membrane thickness conditions, PFA membranes provide a higher output voltage compared to FEP membranes. Moreover, the oxygen permeability of FEP membranes is more significantly affected by temperature. Furthermore, the oxygen permeability of the membrane is inversely proportional to its thickness; the thinner the membrane, the better the oxygen permeability, resulting in a corresponding increase in sensor output voltage. When the membrane thickness is reduced from 0.05 mm to 0.015 mm, the sensor output voltage for PFA and FEP membranes increases by 86% and 74.91%, respectively. However, this study also observed that excessively thin membranes might compromise measurement accuracy. In a saturated, dissolved oxygen environment, the sensor output voltage corresponding to the six oxygen-permeable membranes used in the experiment exhibits a highly linear inverse relationship with temperature (correlation coefficient ≥ 98%). Meanwhile, the lead-tin ratio of the electrode and electrolyte concentration have a relatively minor impact on the sensor output voltage, demonstrating good stability at different temperatures (coefficient of variation ≤ 0.78%). In terms of response time, it is directly proportional to the thickness of the oxygen-permeable membrane, especially for PFA membranes. When the thickness increases from 0.015 mm to 0.05 mm, the response time extends by up to 2033.33%. In contrast, the electrode material and electrolyte concentration have a less significant effect on response time. To further validate the practical value of the experimental results, the best-performing combination of core sensing components from the experiments was selected to construct a new dissolved oxygen sensor. A performance comparison test was conducted between this new sensor and the OxyGuard dissolved oxygen sensor. The results showed that both sensors had the same response time (49 s). However, in an anaerobic environment, the OxyGuard sensor demonstrated slightly higher accuracy by 2.44%. This study not only provides a deep analysis of the combined effects of oxygen-permeable membranes, electrodes, and electrolytes on the performance of galvanic dissolved oxygen sensors but also offers scientific evidence and practical guidance for optimizing sensor design.

Indexed as

dissolved oxygen sensorelectrodeelectrolytegalvanic cell typeoxygen-permeable membraneperformance analysis

Identifiers

PMID39000933
PMCPMC11243800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.