Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39000879›Full record

Trial reportSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Assessing the Impact of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation-Based Fingerboard Training versus Conventional Fingerboard Training on Finger Flexor Endurance in Intermediate to Advanced Sports Climbers: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Carlo Dindorf, Jonas Dully, Joshua Berger, Stephan Becker, Emanuel Wolf, Steven Simon, Eva Bartaguiz, Wolfgang Kemmler, Michael Fröhlich

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carlo DindorfDepartment of Sports Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0378-8481
Jonas DullyDepartment of Sports Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6822-0697
Joshua BergerDepartment of Applied Training Science, German University for Prevention and Health Management, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2241-9174
Stephan BeckerDepartment of Sports Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0115-7064
Emanuel WolfDepartment of Sports Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Steven SimonDepartment of Sports Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0009-0007-0881-6791
Eva BartaguizDepartment of Sports Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Wolfgang KemmlerInstitute of Medical Physics and Microtissue Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3515-0669
Michael FröhlichDepartment of Sports Science, University of Kaiserslautern-Landau (RPTU), 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1982-6374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competitive climbers engage in highly structured training regimens to achieve peak performance levels, with efficient time management as a critical aspect. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) training can close the gap between time-efficient conditioning training and achieving optimal prerequisites for peak climbing-specific performances. Therefore, we examined potential neuromuscular adaptations resulting from the NMFES intervention by analyzing the efficacy of twice-weekly NMES-supported fingerboard (hang board) training compared with thrice-weekly conventional fingerboard training over 7 training weeks in enhancing climbing-specific endurance among intermediate to advanced climbers. Participants were randomly divided into the NMES and control groups. Eighteen participants completed the study (14 male, 4 female; mean age: 25.7 ± 5.3 years; mean climbing experience: 6.4 ± 3.4 years). Endurance was assessed by measuring the maximal time athletes could support their body weight (hanging to exhaustion) on a 20 mm-deep ledge at three intervals: pre-, in-between- (after 4 weeks of training), and post-training (after 7 weeks of training). The findings revealed that despite the lower training volume in the NMES group, no significant differences were observed between the NMES and control groups in climbing-specific endurance. Both groups exhibited notable improvements in endurance, particularly after the in-between test. Consequently, a twice-weekly NMES-supported fingerboard training regimen demonstrated non-inferiority to a thrice-weekly conventional training routine. Incorporating NMES into fingerboard workouts could offer time-saving benefits.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationFingersPhysical EnduranceAdultAthletesFemaleHumansMaleMountaineeringYoung Adultboulderingdead hangelectromyostimulationEMSfinger flexorshang boardlead climbingneuromuscular adaptationresistance trainingsportstraining frequency

Identifiers

PMID39000879
PMCPMC11244570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.