ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Towards Reliability in Smart Water Sensing Technology: Evaluating Classical Machine Learning Models for Outlier Detection.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conditional superiorities and unaddressed bottlenecks: a critical review of artificial intelligence for waterborne microbial detection.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Reliable and Adaptive Probabilistic Forecasting for Event-Driven Water-Quality Time Series Using a Gated Hybrid-Mixture Density Network.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- AHE-FNUQ: An Advanced Hierarchical Ensemble Framework with Neural Network Fusion and Uncertainty Quantification for Outlier Detection in Agri-IoT.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, smart water sensing technology has played a crucial role in water management, addressing the pressing need for efficient monitoring and control of water resources analysis. The challenge in smart water sensing technology resides in ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the data collected by sensors. Outliers are a well-known problem in smart sensing as they can negatively affect the viability of useful analysis and make it difficult to evaluate pertinent data. In this study, we evaluate the performance of four sensors: electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature (Temp), and pH. We implement four classical machine learning models: support vector machine (SVM), artifical neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), and isolated forest (iForest)-based outlier detection as a pre-processing step before visualizing the data. The dataset was collected by a real-time smart water sensing monitoring system installed in Brussels' lakes, rivers, and ponds. The obtained results clearly show that the SVM outperforms the other models, showing 98.38% F1-score rates for pH, 96.98% F1-score rates for temp, 97.88% F1-score rates for DO, and 98.11% F1-score rates for EC. Furthermore, ANN also achieves a significant results, establishing it as a viable alternative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.