Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39000863›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Towards Reliability in Smart Water Sensing Technology: Evaluating Classical Machine Learning Models for Outlier Detection.

Mimoun Lamrini, Bilal Ben Mahria, Mohamed Yassin Chkouri, Abdellah Touhafi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mimoun LamriniDepartment of Engineering Sciences and Technology (INDI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8451-7255
Bilal Ben MahriaSIA Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Fez 30000, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0003-0208-8416
Mohamed Yassin ChkouriSIGL Laboratory, National School of Applied Sciences of Tetuan, Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tetuan 93000, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0001-7256-329X
Abdellah TouhafiDepartment of Engineering Sciences and Technology (INDI), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8891-180X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, smart water sensing technology has played a crucial role in water management, addressing the pressing need for efficient monitoring and control of water resources analysis. The challenge in smart water sensing technology resides in ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the data collected by sensors. Outliers are a well-known problem in smart sensing as they can negatively affect the viability of useful analysis and make it difficult to evaluate pertinent data. In this study, we evaluate the performance of four sensors: electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen (DO), temperature (Temp), and pH. We implement four classical machine learning models: support vector machine (SVM), artifical neural network (ANN), decision tree (DT), and isolated forest (iForest)-based outlier detection as a pre-processing step before visualizing the data. The dataset was collected by a real-time smart water sensing monitoring system installed in Brussels' lakes, rivers, and ponds. The obtained results clearly show that the SVM outperforms the other models, showing 98.38% F1-score rates for pH, 96.98% F1-score rates for temp, 97.88% F1-score rates for DO, and 98.11% F1-score rates for EC. Furthermore, ANN also achieves a significant results, establishing it as a viable alternative.

Indexed as

anomaly detectionmachine learningsensors of water technology

Identifiers

PMID39000863
PMCPMC11244236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.