Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39000773›Full record

ReviewPolymers2024

Analytical Model to Deduce the Conformational and Dynamical Behavior in Dendrimers: A Review.

Shelly Bhardwaj, Amit Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shelly BhardwajTheory & Simulation Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi 110025, India.ORCID 0000-0001-5452-5636
Amit KumarTheory & Simulation Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Jamia Millia Islamia (A Central University), New Delhi 110025, India.ORCID 0000-0002-3729-4853

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review utilizes an optimized Rouse-Zimm discrete hydrodynamic model and the preaveraged Oseen tensor, which accurately consider hydrodynamic interactions to study model dendrimers. We report the analytical theories that have been previously developed for the creation of generalized analytical models for dendrimers. These generalized theories were used to assess the conformational and dynamical behavior of the dendrimers. By including stiffness in the bonds, the neglect of excluded volume interactions may be somewhat offset. This is true at least in the case of short spacers. While the topological limitations on the directions and orientations of the individual bond vectors in dendrimers implement semiflexibility, the intensity of these contacts was determined by the potential geometric orientations of the bonds, and later on the excluded volume interactions in dendrimers, which were described in terms of the effective co-volume between nearest non-bonded monomers and modeled using the delta function pseudopotential. With the aid of the models developed, the authors condensed various conformational and dynamic properties of dendrimers that depend on their degree of semiflexibility and the strength of the excluded volume. These analyses came to the conclusion that the flexible dendrimer in one limit and the earlier described freely rotating model of dendrimers in the other constitute a highly generalized way of capturing a wide range of conformations in the developed mathematical model in dendrimers.

Indexed as

conformationdendrimerexcluded-volumerelaxationrheologysemiflexibility

Identifiers

PMID39000773
PMCPMC11244006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.