Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39000737›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

In-Plane Compression Properties of Continuous Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Composite Hybrid Lattice Structures by Additive Manufacturing.

Lingqi Jin, Jun Shi, Zhixin Chen, Zhiyang Wang, Yangfan Zhi, Lei Yang, Xinyi Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lingqi JinSchool of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Jun ShiSchool of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Zhixin ChenSchool of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Zhiyang WangSchool of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Yangfan ZhiSchool of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.
Lei YangSchool of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8860-843X
Xinyi XiaoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, The University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203-1277, USA.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China U2341270Science and Technology Department of Hubei Province 2022BAA030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous-fiber-reinforced composite lattice structures (CFRCLSs) have garnered attention due to their lightweight and high-strength characteristics. Over the past two decades, many different topological structures including triangular, square, hexagonal, and circular units were investigated, and the basic mechanical responses of honeycomb structures under various load conditions, including tension, compression, buckling, shear, and fatigue were studied. To further improve the performance of the honeycombs, appropriate optimizations were also carried out. However, the mechanical properties of a single lattice often struggle to exceed the upper limit of its structure. This paper investigates the effect of permutation and hybrid mode on the mechanical properties of CFRCLSs by comparing five structures: rhomboid (R-type), octagon orthogonal array (OOA-type), octagon hypotenuse array (OHA-type), octagon nested array (ONA-type), and rhomboid circle (RC-type), with the conventional hexagonal structure (H-type). CFRCLS samples are fabricated using fused filament fabrication (FFF), with carbon-fiber-reinforced polylactic acid (PLA) as the matrix. The in-plane compression properties, energy absorption characteristics, and deformation behaviors of the hybrid structures were studied by experimental tests. The results demonstrate that different permutation and hybrid modes alter the deformation behaviors and mechanical properties of the structures. Taking elastic modulus as an example, the values of H-type, R-type, OOA-type, OHA-type, ONA-type, and RC-type are, respectively, 6.08 MPa, 5.76 MPa, 19.0 MPa, 10.3 MPa, 31.7 MPa, and 73.2 MPa, while the ratio of their masses is 1:1:1.10:1.52:1.66. Furthermore, hybrid lattice structures exhibit significantly improved mechanical properties compared to single lattice structures. Compared to the single structure R-type, the RC-type increases elastic modulus, yield strength, and energy absorption, respectively, by 12.7 times, 5.4 times, and 4.4 times.

Indexed as

continuous carbon-fiber-reinforced compositehybrid lattice structuresmultiple permutationspath arrangement

Identifiers

PMID39000737
PMCPMC11243952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.