Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39000723›Full record

ArticlePolymers2024

Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Polymeric Materials-PLA and PETG-For Biomechanical Applications.

Rui F Martins, Ricardo Branco, Miguel Martins, Wojciech Macek, Zbigniew Marciniak, Rui Silva, Daniela Trindade, Carla Moura, Margarida Franco, Cândida Malça

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rui F MartinsUNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Nova School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8155-0079
Ricardo BrancoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, CEMMPRE, ARISE, University of Coimbra, Rua Luís Reis Santos, Pinhal de Marrocos, 3030-788 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2471-1125
Miguel MartinsUNIDEMI, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Nova School of Science and Technology, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.
Wojciech MacekFaculty of Mechanical Engineering and Ship Technology, Gdańsk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11/12, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9079-8877
Zbigniew MarciniakDepartment of Mechanics and Machine Design, Opole University of Technology, Mikołajczyka 5, 45-271 Opole, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7071-4488
Rui SilvaCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development, CDRSP, Polytechnic of Leiria, Rua de Portugal, 2430-028 Marinha Grande, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3931-8206
Daniela TrindadeCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development, CDRSP, Polytechnic of Leiria, Rua de Portugal, 2430-028 Marinha Grande, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-3621-7095
Carla MouraApplied Research Institute, Polytechnic Institute of Coimbra, Rua da Misericórdia, Lagar dos Cortiços, S. Martinho do Bispo, 3045-093 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2610-1005
Margarida FrancoCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development, CDRSP, Polytechnic of Leiria, Rua de Portugal, 2430-028 Marinha Grande, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9659-7646
Cândida MalçaCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development, CDRSP, Polytechnic of Leiria, Rua de Portugal, 2430-028 Marinha Grande, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0012-4380

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/00285/2020 and LA/P/0112/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/00667/2020 and UIDP/00667/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/04044/2020 and UIDP/04044/2020Gdańsk University of Technology 23/2021/EDU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study presented herein concerns the mechanical properties of two common polymers for potential biomedical applications, PLA and PETG, processed through fused filament fabrication (FFF)-Material Extrusion (ME). For the uniaxial tension tests carried out, two printing orientations-XY (Horizontal, H) and YZ (Vertical, V)-were considered according to the general principles for part positioning, coordinates, and orientation typically used in additive manufacturing (AM). In addition, six specimens were tested for each printing orientation and material, providing insights into mechanical properties such as Tensile Strength, Young's Modulus, and Ultimate Strain, suggesting the materials' potential for biomedical applications. The experimental results were then compared with correspondent mechanical properties obtained from the literature for other polymers like ASA, PC, PP, ULTEM 9085, Copolyester, and Nylon. Thereafter, fatigue resistance curves (S-N curves) for PLA and PETG, printed along 45°, were determined at room temperature for a load ratio, R, of 0.2. Scanning electron microscope observations revealed fibre arrangements, compression/adhesion between layers, and fracture zones, shedding light on the failure mechanisms involved in the fatigue crack propagation of such materials and giving design reference values for future applications. In addition, fractographic analyses of the fatigue fracture surfaces were carried out, as well as X-ray Computed Tomography (XCT) and Thermogravimetric (TGA)/Differential Scanning Calorimetric (DSC) tests.

Indexed as

additive manufacturingbiomechanicalfatigue resistancematerial extrusionmechanical propertiespolymers

Identifiers

PMID39000723
PMCPMC11243948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.