ArticlePolymers2024
Machine Learning in the Analysis of the Mechanical Shredding Process of Polymer Recyclates.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence methods and techniques creatively support the processes of developing and improving methods for selecting shredders for the processing of polymer materials. This allows to optimize the fulfillment of selection criteria, which may include not only indicators related to shredding efficiency and recyclate quality but also energy consumption. The aim of this paper is to select methods of analysis based on artificial intelligence (AI) with independent rule extraction, i.e., data-based methods (machine learning-ML). This study took into account real data sets (feature matrix 1982 rows × 40 columns) describing the shredding process, including energy consumption used to optimize the parameters for the energy efficiency of the shredder. Each of the 1982 records in a .csv file (feature vector) has 40 numbers divided by commas. The data were divided into a learning set (70% of the data), a testing set (20% of the data), and a validation set (10% of the data). Cross-validation showed that the best model was LbfgsLogisticRegressionOva (0.9333). This promotes the development of the basis for an intelligent shredding methodology with a high level of innovation in the processing and recycling of polymer materials within the Industry 4.0 paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.