ArticlePolymers2024
New Chitosan-Based Co-Delivery Nanosystem for Diabetes Mellitus Therapy.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chitosan-Based Nanocarriers Co-Delivering Pioglitazone and Curcumin: Biological Activity and Therapeutic Potential in Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- The Transformative Role of Nanotechnology in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: Insights from Current Research.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Applications and prospects of biomaterials in diabetes management.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most common metabolic disorders, with a major involvement of oxidative stress in its onset and progression. Pioglitazone (Pio) is an antidiabetic drug that mainly works by reducing insulin resistance, while curcumin (Cur) is a powerful antioxidant with an important hypoglycemic effect. Both drugs are associated with several drawbacks, such as reduced bioavailability and a short half-life time (Pio), as well as instability and poor water solubility (Cur), which limit their therapeutic use. In order to overcome these disadvantages, new co-delivery (Pio and Cur) chitosan-based nanoparticles (CS-Pio-Cur NPs) were developed and compared with simple NPs (CS-Pio/CS-Cur NPs). The NPs were characterized using dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). In addition, the entrapment efficiency (EE) and loading capacity (LC), as well as the release profile, of the APIs (Pio and Cur) from the CS-APIs NPs in simulated fluids (SGF, SIF, and SCF) were also assessed. All the CS-APIs NPs presented a small particle size (PS) (211.6-337.4 nm), a proper polydispersity index (PI) (0.104 and 0.289), and a positive zeta potential (ZP) (21.83 mV-32.64 mV). Based on the TEM results, an amorphous state could be attributed to the CA-APIs NPs, and the TEM analysis showed a spherical shape with a nanometric size for the CS-Pio-Cur NPs. The FT-IR spectroscopy supported the successful loading of the APIs into the CS matrix and proved some interactions between the APIs and CS. The CS-Pio-Cur NPs presented increased or similar EE (85.76% ± 4.89 for Cur; 92.16% ± 3.79 for Pio) and LC% (23.40% ± 1.62 for Cur; 10.14% ± 0.98 for Pio) values in comparison with simple NPs, CS-Cur NPs (EE = 82.46% ± 1.74; LC = 22.31% ± 0.94), and CS-Pio NPs (EE = 93.67% ± 0.89; LC = 11.24% ± 0.17), respectively. Finally, based on the release profile results, it can be appreciated that the developed co-delivery nanosystem, CS-Pio-Cur NPs, assures a controlled and prolonged release of Pio and Cur from the polymer matrix along the GI tract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.