ArticlePolymers2024
Prediction of Residual Compressive Strength after Impact Based on Acoustic Emission Characteristic Parameters.
Article in Polymers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a prediction method for residual compressive strength after impact based on the extreme gradient boosting model, focusing on composite laminates as the studied material system. Acoustic emission tests were conducted under controlled temperature and humidity conditions to collect characteristic parameters, establishing a mapping relationship between these parameters and residual compressive strength under small sample conditions. The model accurately predicted the residual compressive strength of the laminates after impact, with the coefficient of determination and root mean square error for the test set being 0.9910 and 2.9174, respectively. A comparison of the performance of the artificial neural network model and the extreme gradient boosting model shows that, in the case of small data volumes, the extreme gradient boosting model exhibits superior accuracy and robustness compared to the artificial neural network. Furthermore, the sensitivity of acoustic emission characteristic parameters is analyzed using the SHAP method, revealing that indicators such as peak amplitude, ring count, energy, and peak frequency significantly impact the prediction results of residual compressive strength. The machine-learning-based method for assessing the damage tolerance of composite laminates proposed in this paper utilizes the global monitoring advantages of acoustic emission technology to rapidly predict the residual compressive strength after the impact of composite laminates, providing a theoretical approach for online structural health monitoring of composite laminates. This method is applicable to various composite laminate structures under different impact conditions, demonstrating its broad applicability and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.