Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39000578›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

The Gut and Skin Microbiome and Its Association with Aging Clocks.

Mildred Min, Caitlin Egli, Raja K Sivamani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Aging-Induced Changes inMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mildred MinIntegrative Skin Science and Research, 1451 River Park Drive, Suite 222, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6201-7401
Caitlin EgliIntegrative Skin Science and Research, 1451 River Park Drive, Suite 222, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA.
Raja K SivamaniIntegrative Skin Science and Research, 1451 River Park Drive, Suite 222, Sacramento, CA 95819, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7205-8162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aging clocks are predictive models of biological age derived from age-related changes, such as epigenetic changes, blood biomarkers, and, more recently, the microbiome. Gut and skin microbiota regulate more than barrier and immune function. Recent studies have shown that human microbiomes may predict aging. In this narrative review, we aim to discuss how the gut and skin microbiomes influence aging clocks as well as clarify the distinction between chronological and biological age. A literature search was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE databases with the following keywords: "skin microbiome" OR "gut microbiome" AND "aging clock" OR "epigenetic". Gut and skin microbiomes may be utilized to create aging clocks based on taxonomy, biodiversity, and functionality. The top contributing microbiota or metabolic pathways in these aging clocks may influence aging clock predictions and biological age. Furthermore, gut and skin microbiota may directly and indirectly influence aging clocks through the regulation of clock genes and the production of metabolites that serve as substrates or enzymatic regulators. Microbiome-based aging clock models may have therapeutic potential. However, more research is needed to advance our understanding of the role of microbiota in aging clocks.

Indexed as

AgingGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaSkinAnimalsBiological ClocksEpigenesis, GeneticHumansaging clocksbiological agechronological ageepigeneticmetagenomicmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID39000578
PMCPMC11242811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.