Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39000377›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024

Direct Current Electrical Stimulation Shifts THP-1-Derived Macrophage Polarization towards Pro-Regenerative M2 Phenotype.

Santiago Bianconi, Liudmila Leppik, Elsie Oppermann, Ingo Marzi, Dirk Henrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Santiago BianconiDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7656-7212
Liudmila LeppikDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0362-4727
Elsie OppermannDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ingo MarziDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3677-2910
Dirk HenrichDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopedics, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9728-4032

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) CO 2179/1-1 and NA 1712/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A macrophage shift from the M1 to the M2 phenotype is relevant for promoting tissue repair and regeneration. In a previous in vivo study, we found that direct current (DC) electrical stimulation (EStim) increased the proportion of M2 macrophages in healing tissues and directed the balance of the injury response away from healing/scarring towards regeneration. These observations led us to hypothesize that DC EStim regulates macrophage polarization towards an M2 phenotype. THP-1-derived M0, M1 (IFN-γ and LPS), and M2 (IL-4 and IL-13) macrophages were exposed (or not: control group) to 100 mV/mm of DC EStim, 1 h/day for three days. Macrophage polarization was assessed through gene and surface marker expressions and cytokine secretion profiles. Following DC EStim treatment, M0 cells exhibited an upregulation of M2 marker genes IL10, CD163, and PPARG. In M1 cells, DC EStim upregulated the gene expressions of M2 markers IL10, TGM2, and CD206 and downregulated M1 marker gene CD86. EStim treatment also reduced the surface expression of CD86 and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6. Our results suggest that DC EStim differentially exerts pro-M2 effects depending on the macrophage phenotype: it upregulates typical M2 genes in M0 and M1 cells while inhibiting M1 marker CD86 at the nuclear and protein levels and the secretion of pro-inflammatory interleukins in M1 cells. Conversely, M2 cells appear to be less responsive to the EStim treatment employed in this study.

Indexed as

Electric StimulationMacrophagesPhenotypeAntigens, CDCell PolarityCytokinesHumansInterleukin-4Macrophage ActivationReceptors, Cell SurfaceTHP-1 CellsAntigens, CDCytokinesInterleukin-4Receptors, Cell Surfacedirect current electrical stimulationmacrophage polarizationTHP-1-derived macrophagestissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID39000377
PMCPMC11242703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.