In one paragraphArticle in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from itWhat it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
10 authors.
Abel Villa-ManceraFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Tecamachalco Puebla 75460, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-5997-5641 Javier Maldonado-HidalgoFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Tecamachalco Puebla 75460, Mexico.
Manuel Robles-RoblesFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Tecamachalco Puebla 75460, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8541-850X Jaime Olivares-PérezUnidad Académica de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Ciudad Altamirano 39640, Mexico.
Agustín Olmedo-JuárezCentro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Salud Animal e Inocuidad (CENID SAI-INIFAP), Carretera Federal Cuernavaca-Cuautla No. 8534, Colonia Progreso, Jiutepec 62550, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-5499-7449 José Rodríguez-CastilloFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Tecamachalco Puebla 75460, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-7755-1623 Noemi Pérez-MendozaFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Tecamachalco Puebla 75460, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8915-6914 Fernando Utrera-QuintanaFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Tecamachalco Puebla 75460, Mexico.
José PérezDepartamento de Anatomía y Anatomía Patológica Comparadas y Toxicología, Unidad de Excelencia ENZOEM, Universidad de Córdoba, 14014 Córdoba, Spain.
Samuel Ortega-VargasFacultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Tecamachalco Puebla 75460, Mexico.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Fasciolosis, a globally re-emerging zoonotic disease, is mostly caused by the parasitic infection with
Indexed as
Cathepsin LFasciola hepaticaFascioliasisGoatsVaccinationAnimalsBacteriophagesFemaleGoat DiseasesMaleParasite Egg CountCathepsin Lcathepsin L mimotopesegg productionFasciola hepaticagoatsMehlis’ glandovaryphage displayreproductive histologytestisvaccine developmentvitellaria
Identifiers
PMID39000332
PMCPMC11241617
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390