ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
iNP_ESM: Neuropeptide Identification Based on Evolutionary Scale Modeling and Unified Representation Embedding Features.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Insect neuropeptides as agents for pest control: potential and challenges.Biological research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuropeptides are biomolecules with crucial physiological functions. Accurate identification of neuropeptides is essential for understanding nervous system regulatory mechanisms. However, traditional analysis methods are expensive and laborious, and the development of effective machine learning models continues to be a subject of current research. Hence, in this research, we constructed an SVM-based machine learning neuropeptide predictor, iNP_ESM, by integrating protein language models Evolutionary Scale Modeling (ESM) and Unified Representation (UniRep) for the first time. Our model utilized feature fusion and feature selection strategies to improve prediction accuracy during optimization. In addition, we validated the effectiveness of the optimization strategy with UMAP (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection) visualization. iNP_ESM outperforms existing models on a variety of machine learning evaluation metrics, with an accuracy of up to 0.937 in cross-validation and 0.928 in independent testing, demonstrating optimal neuropeptide recognition capabilities. We anticipate improved neuropeptide data in the future, and we believe that the iNP_ESM model will have broader applications in the research and clinical treatment of neurological diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.