ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2024
Photosealed Neurorrhaphy Using Autologous Tissue.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Comparison of Photochemically Sealed Commercial Biomembranes for Nerve Regeneration.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Photochemical sealing of a nerve wrap over the repair site isolates and optimizes the regenerating nerve microenvironment. To facilitate clinical adoption of the technology, we investigated photosealed autologous tissue in a rodent sciatic nerve transection and repair model. Rats underwent transection of the sciatic nerve with repair performed in three groups: standard microsurgical neurorrhaphy (SN) and photochemical sealing with a crosslinked human amnion (xHAM) or autologous vein. Functional recovery was assessed at four-week intervals using footprint analysis. Gastrocnemius muscle mass preservation, histology, and nerve histomorphometry were evaluated at 120 days. Nerves treated with a PTB-sealed autologous vein improved functional recovery at 120 days although the comparison between groups was not significantly different (SN: -58.4 +/- 10.9; XHAM: -57.9 +/- 8.7; Vein: -52.4 +/- 17.1). Good muscle mass preservation was observed in all groups, with no statistical differences between groups (SN: 69 +/- 7%; XHAM: 70 +/- 7%; Vein: 70 +/- 7%). Histomorphometry showed good axonal regeneration in all repair techniques. These results demonstrate that peripheral nerve repair using photosealed autologous veins produced regeneration at least equivalent to current gold-standard microsurgery. The use of autologous veins removes costs and foreign body concerns and would be readily available during surgery. This study illustrates a new repair method that could restore normal endoneurial homeostasis with minimal trauma following severe nerve injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.