Trial reportNutrients2024
The Effect of the
Trial report in Nutrients, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Influence of Lactobacillus plantarum on anthropometric and inflammatory parameters in obesity: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of probiotic supplementation for body weight management in overweight and obese adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials predominantly from East Asia.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Lactiplantibacillus plantarum: Systems Biology of a Versatile Microbe.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Strain-Specific Effects of three Different Native Lactobacillus on Anthropometric Indices, Appetite, and Nesfatin-1 in Obese Adults: A Triple-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Article
- Effect ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BN-202M is derived from humans and consists of two strains,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.