Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38999669›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Effect of Different Fertilizer Types on Quality of Foxtail Millet under Low Nitrogen Conditions.

Tingting Zheng, Shu Wang, Mengyao Wang, Jiao Mao, Yuanmeng Xu, Jiangling Ren, Yuhan Liu, Sichen Liu, Zhijun Qiao, Xiaoning Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tingting ZhengCenter for Agricultural Genetic Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China.
Shu WangCenter for Agricultural Genetic Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China.
Mengyao WangCenter for Agricultural Genetic Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China.
Jiao MaoCenter for Agricultural Genetic Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China.
Yuanmeng XuCenter for Agricultural Genetic Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China.
Jiangling RenCenter for Agricultural Genetic Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China.
Yuhan LiuCenter for Agricultural Genetic Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China.
Sichen LiuCenter for Agricultural Genetic Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China.
Zhijun QiaoCenter for Agricultural Genetic Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China.
Xiaoning CaoCenter for Agricultural Genetic Resources Research, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, China.

Funding

This research was funded by the the earmarked fund for CARS(CARS-06-14.5-A16), the Central Guided Local Science and Technology Development Funds (YDZJSX2022A044, YDZJSX20231A040),and the earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System ( This research was funded by the the earmarked fund for CARS(CARS-06-14.5-A16), the Central Guided Local Science and Technology Development Funds (YDZJSX2022A044, YDZJSX20231A040),and the earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to clarify the effect of different fertilizers on foxtail millet quality under low nitrogen conditions, we used JGNo.21 and LZGNo.2 as experimental materials and set up five treatments, including non-fertilization, nitrogen, phosphorus, compound, and organic fertilizers, to study the regulation of different fertilizer types on agronomic traits, nutrient fractions, and pasting characteristics of foxtail millet under low nitrogen conditions. Compared with the control, all of the fertilizers improved the agronomic traits of JGNo.21 to a certain extent. Nitrogen and compound fertilizer treatments reduced the starch content of JGNo.21; the starch content was reduced by 0.55% and 0.07% under nitrogen and compound fertilizers treatments. Phosphorus and organic fertilizers increased starch content, and starch content increased by 0.50% and 0.56% under phosphorus and organic fertilizer treatments. The effect of each fertilizer treatment on protein content was completely opposite to that of starch; different fertilizer treatments reduced the fat content of JGNo.21 and increased the fiber content. Among them, nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers increased the yellow pigment content; the yellow pigment content increased by 1.21% and 2.64% under nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer treatments. Organic and compound fertilizers reduced the content of yellow pigment; the yellow pigment content was reduced by 3.36% and 2.79% under organic and compound fertilizer treatments. Nitrogen and organic fertilizers increased the fat content of LZGNo.2; the fat content increased by 2.62% and 1.98% under nitrogen, organic fertilizer treatment. Compound and phosphorus fertilizer decreased the fat content; the fat content decreased by 2.16% and 2.90% under compound and phosphorus fertilizer treatment. Different fertilizer treatments reduced the cellulose and yellow pigment content of LZGNo.2. The content of essential, non-essential, and total amino acids of JGNo.21 was increased under compound and nitrogen fertilizer treatments and decreased under organic and phosphorus fertilizer treatments. The content of essential, non-essential, and total amino acids of LZGNo.2 was significantly higher under compound, nitrogen, and organic fertilizer treatments compared with control and significantly decreased under phosphorus fertilizer treatments. Nitrogen and compound fertilizer treatments significantly reduced the values of peak viscosity, trough viscosity, breakdown viscosity, final viscosity, setback viscosity, and pasting time of each index of JGNo.21; phosphorus and organic fertilizer treatments improved the values of each index. In contrast, the pasting viscosity of LZGNo.2 increased under phosphorus fertilizer treatment and decreased under nitrogen fertilizer treatment. Reasonable fertilization can improve the quality of foxtail millet, which provides a scientific theoretical basis for improving the quality of foxtail millet.

Indexed as

agronomic traitsfertilization typefoxtail milletqualitystarch pasting

Identifiers

PMID38999669
PMCPMC11244521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.