Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38999392›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Restoring Sensation through Abdominal Flap Neurotization in Breast Reconstruction.

Max L Silverstein, Arash Momeni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Concepts and clinical practice of functional reconstruction of complex wounds].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026
    Review
  2. Aligning Patient and Surgeon Aesthetic Priorities in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study.Indian journal of plastic surgery : official publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Max L SilversteinDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6771-9974
Arash MomeniDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6452-751X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast sensation plays a significant role in the safety and quality of life of women who undergo mastectomy and reconstruction. In 1992, Slezak et al. introduced the concept of abdominal flap neurotization to improve sensation of the reconstructed breast. Over the next 30 years, numerous studies iterated on Slezak's technique, suggesting technical modifications and new methodologies for assessing sensory recovery. Despite evidence that reinnervation increases patient satisfaction following autologous breast reconstruction, abdominal flap neurotization remains a rarely performed procedure. In this article, we review the evolution of flap neurotization in breast reconstruction and describe our approach to facilitating sensory recovery of the breast while limiting donor site morbidity.

Indexed as

breast reconstructionneurotizationreinnervation

Identifiers

PMID38999392
PMCPMC11242435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.