Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38999387›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Solid Renal Lesions.

Monika Zbroja, Maryla Kuczyńska, Katarzyna Drelich, Eryk Mikos, Agata Zarajczyk, Mateusz Cheda, Izabela Dąbrowska, Anna Drelich-Zbroja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters for predicting benign and malignant greater omentum lesions: an applied study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monika ZbrojaDepartment of Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Maryla KuczyńskaDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7869-9841
Katarzyna DrelichStudents' Scientific Society at the Department of Pediatric Radiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Eryk MikosStudents' Scientific Society at the Department of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0507-2882
Agata ZarajczykStudents' Scientific Society at the Department of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.
Mateusz ChedaDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5757-3307
Izabela DąbrowskaDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1593-2284
Anna Drelich-ZbrojaDepartment of Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Medical University of Lublin, 20-090 Lublin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of imaging methods has enabled increased detection of kidney lesions, which are a common clinical problem. It is estimated that more than half of patients over the age of 50 have at least one undetermined mass in the kidney. The appropriate characterization and diagnosis of lesions imaged in the kidney allows for proper therapeutic management. Previously, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been used in their extended diagnosis. However, the limitations of these techniques, such as radiation exposure, renal toxicity, and allergies to contrast agents, must be considered. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is increasingly being used as an examination to resolve interpretive doubts that arise with other diagnostic methods. Indeed, it can be considered both as a problem-solving technique for diagnosing and distinguishing lesions and as a technique used for observation in preservative treatment. Evaluation of the enhancement curve over time on CEUS examination can help to differentiate malignant renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes that should be resected from benign lesions, such as oncocytoma or angiomyolipoma (AML), in which surgery can be avoided. It allows for distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors, renal and pseudotumors, and solid and cystic tumors. Therefore, with recent advances in ultrasound technology, CEUS has emerged as a fast, reliable, and cost-effective imaging tool in the preoperative evaluation and diagnosis of solid renal masses.

Indexed as

CEUSdiagnostic imagingrenal lesions

Identifiers

PMID38999387
PMCPMC11242659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.