ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024
VAC-Stent in the Treatment of Post-Esophagectomy Anastomotic Leaks: A New "Kid on the Block" Who Marries the Best of Old Techniques-A Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Endoscopic negative-pressure therapy for anastomotic leaks after upper gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- VacStent as a novel therapeutic approach for esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks- a systematic review of the literature.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Predicting need for step-up approach and recurrence in endoscopic management of anastomotic strictures after esophagectomy: results from a 10-year multicenter retrospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Endoscopic Management of Post-Bariatric Surgery Complications: Diagnostic Work-Up and Innovative Approaches for Leak, Fistula, and Stricture Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Management of delayed perforation after esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection using a vacuum-assisted closure stent.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- A rare cause of posttraumatic esophageal perforation successfully treated with a new vacuum stent.Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS)-Based Multimodal Diagnosis of a Rare Intramural Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Vacuum-assisted self-expanding stents in colorectal surgery: early experiences with a novel tool.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Endoscopic stenting for benign upper gastrointestinal conditions: safety and efficacy profile of a fully covered double-bump antimigratory stent.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Stenting Versus Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for Anastomotic Leakage After Esophago-Gastric Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Boerhaave Syndrome-Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Transforming Gastrointestinal Diagnosis with Molecular Endoscopy: Challenges and Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Umbrella Review of the Management of Esophageal Anastomotic Leaks.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Strictures After Esophagogastric Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Emerging Approaches Beyond Endoscopic Dilation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- [Modern approaches and technologies to prevent anastomotic leakage in the gastrointestinal tract].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophagectomy, while a pivotal treatment for esophageal cancer, is not without adverse events. Among these, anastomotic leak (AL) is the most feared complication, threatening patient lives and incurring significant healthcare costs. The management of AL is complex and lacks standardization. Given the high morbidity and mortality rates associated with redo-surgery, which poses risks for already fragile patients, various endoscopic treatments have been developed over time. Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) were the most widely used treatment until the early 2000s. The mechanism of action of SEMSs includes covering the wall defect, protecting it from secretions, and promoting healing. In 2010, endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) emerged as a viable alternative for treating ALs, quickly gaining acceptance in clinical practice. EVT involves placing a dedicated sponge under negative pressure inside or adjacent to the wall defect, aiming to clear the leak and promote granulation tissue formation. More recently, the VAC-Stent entered the scenario of endoscopic treatment of post-esophagectomy ALs. This device combines a fully covered SEMS with an integrated EVT sponge, blending the ability of SEMSs to exclude defects and maintain the patency of the esophageal lumen with the capacity of EVT to aspirate secretions and promote the formation of granulation tissue. Although the literature on this new device is not extensive, early results from the application of VAC-Stent have shown promising outcomes. This review aims to synthesize the preliminary efficacy and safety data on the device, thoroughly analyze its advantages over traditional techniques and disadvantages, explore areas for improvement, and propose future directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.