Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38999224›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2024

Cardiovascular Imaging for Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus.

Biljana Nedeljkovic Beleslin, Arif Al Nooryani, Branko Beleslin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Biljana Nedeljkovic BeleslinClinic for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, University Clinical Center of Serbia, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Arif Al NooryaniAl Qassimi Hospital, Sharjah 3500, United Arab Emirates.
Branko BeleslinMedical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.ORCID 0000-0001-9452-8241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with diabetes mellitus, accelerated progression of atherosclerosis can lead to worse clinical outcomes. Determining the best diagnostic strategy to identify patients with increased cardiovascular risk is challenging. Current guidelines recommend using both functional imaging and CT angiography to detect myocardial ischemia and coronary artery disease based on pre-test probability. Functional imaging is suggested for patients with a higher clinical likelihood due to its higher rule-in diagnostic capacity. On the other hand, CT angiography is preferred for patients with lower pre-test probability because of its excellent negative predictive value. The optimal management strategy for asymptomatic diabetic patients remains unclear. In asymptomatic diabetic patients, previous randomized trials have not shown benefits from diagnostic testing over standard care. However, these trials were methodologically inconsistent and lacked clear stratification of cardiovascular risk. In terms of invasive evaluation, a combined invasive functional and anatomic imaging approach for angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis appears to be the best, most effective decision pathway for managing diabetic patients.

Indexed as

coronary flow reservediabetes mellitusfractional flow reservenon-invasive functional imagingoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID38999224
PMCPMC11242819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.