Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38999113›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Recycling and Reuse of Spent LIBs: Technological Advances and Future Directions.

Long Lv, Siqi Zhou, Changqi Liu, Yuan Sun, Jubing Zhang, Changsheng Bu, Junguang Meng, Yaji Huang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Long LvSchool of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China.
Siqi ZhouSchool of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China.
Changqi LiuSchool of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6959-2161
Yuan SunState Key Laboratory of NBC Protection for Civilian, Beijing 100083, China.
Jubing ZhangSchool of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China.
Changsheng BuSchool of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China.
Junguang MengSchool of Energy and Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210046, China.
Yaji HuangKey Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.

Funding

Science and Technology Support Program of Jiangsu Province No. BE2022604 & BE2021701The Key Research and Development Program of Zhenjiang City No. SH2023112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recovering valuable metals from spent lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), a kind of solid waste with high pollution and high-value potential, is very important. In recent years, the extraction of valuable metals from the cathodes of spent LIBs and cathode regeneration technology are still rapidly developing (such as flash Joule heating technology to regenerate cathodes). This review summarized the studies published in the recent ten years to catch the rapid pace of development in this field. The development, structure, and working principle of LIBs were firstly introduced. Subsequently, the recent developments in mechanisms and processes of pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy for extracting valuable metals and cathode regeneration were summarized. The commonly used processes, products, and efficiencies for the recycling of nickel-cobalt-manganese cathodes (NCM/LCO/LMO/NCA) and lithium iron phosphate (LFP) cathodes were analyzed and compared. Compared with pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy, the regeneration method was a method with a higher resource utilization rate, which has more industrial application prospects. Finally, this paper pointed out the shortcomings of the current research and put forward some suggestions for the recovery and reuse of spent lithium-ion battery cathodes in the future.

Indexed as

cathode material recyclingcathode regenerationsolid waste treatmentspent lithium-ion batteriesvaluable metal extraction

Identifiers

PMID38999113
PMCPMC11243651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.