Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Alena ZolotarevaInternational Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5724-2882
Anna KhegayInternational Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5322-4222
Elena VoevodinaInternational Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3743-502X
Igor KritskyInstitute of Immunology and Physiology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 620049 Ekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-9402-051X
Roman IbragimovInstitute of Immunology and Physiology, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 620049 Ekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2043-1743
Nina NizovskihDepartment of Psychology, Vyatka State University, 610000 Kirov, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5541-5049
Vsevolod KonstantinovDepartment of General Psychology, Penza State University, 440026 Penza, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1443-3195
Arina MalenovaDepartment of General and Social Psychology, Dostoevsky Omsk State University, 644077 Omsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5778-0739
Irina BelashevaDepartment of General Psychology and Personality Psychology, North-Caucasus Federal University, 355017 Stavropol, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1289-2224
Natalia KhodyrevaDepartment of Psychology, Saint-Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Vladimir PreobrazhenskyInternational Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1456-6315
Kristina AzanovaInternational Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.
Lilia SarapultsevaDepartment of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University, 620143 Ekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID 0009-0007-6896-3486
Almira GalimovaDepartment of Theory and Technology of Social Work, Samara National Research University, 443086 Samara, Russia.
Inna AtamanovaDepartment of Genetic and Clinical Psychology, Tomsk State University, 634050 Tomsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8101-5586
Anastasia KulikDepartment of Theoretical and Practical Psychology, Kamchatka State University Named after Vitus Bering, 683032 Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, Russia.
Yulia NeyaskinaDepartment of Theoretical and Practical Psychology, Kamchatka State University Named after Vitus Bering, 683032 Petropavlovsk-Kamchatskiy, Russia.
Maksim LapshinDepartment of Sports Improvement, South Ural State University, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8290-1774
Ruslan KadyrovDepartment of General Psychological Disciplines, Pacific State Medical University, 690002 Vladivostok, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3778-5548
Ekaterina VolkovaDepartment of General Psychological Disciplines, Pacific State Medical University, 690002 Vladivostok, Russia.
Viktoria DrachkovaDepartment of Psychology, Saint-Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Andrey SeryyDepartment of Psychology, Kemerovo State University, 650000 Kemerovo, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9318-4333
Natalia KoshelevaInternational Laboratory of Positive Psychology of Personality and Motivation, HSE University, 101000 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9547-7148
Evgeny OsinLaboratory LINP2, University of Paris Nanterre, 92001 Nanterre, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3330-5647
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
There is scarce evidence of a relationship between positive and psychosomatic characteristics. This study aimed to examine the associations of somatic burden with psychological resources such as optimism, resilience, and general self-efficacy. Russian participants (n = 1020) completed measures of psychological resources at Time 1 and somatic symptoms at Time 2. The results showed that somatic burden decreased with greater levels of optimism, resilience, and general self-efficacy. Regarding health and sociodemographic characteristics, female sex increased somatic burden in the model with optimism scores, university education decreased somatic burden in the model with resilience scores, and history of COVID-19 disease increased somatic burden in the models with optimism, resilience, and general self-efficacy scores. This study has theoretical and practical contributions. It combines positive psychology and psychosomatic medicine and highlights the value of psychological resource interventions in the treatment and prevention of somatic burden. These findings may be useful for scientists, clinicians, and practitioners.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Optimism, Resilience, and General Self-Efficacy Predict Lower Somatic Burden during the COVID-19 Pandemic. · full record | OpenQuestion