Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38998089›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Goats on the Move: Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Goat Activity Analysis Using Accelerometer Data.

Arthur Hollevoet, Timo De Waele, Daniel Peralta, Frank Tuyttens, Eli De Poorter, Adnan Shahid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arthur HollevoetIDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-imec, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 126, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.
Timo De WaeleIDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-imec, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 126, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6518-9834
Daniel PeraltaIDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-imec, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 126, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7544-8411
Frank TuyttensFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, D8, Heidestraat 19, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-1348-218X
Eli De PoorterIDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-imec, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 126, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0214-5751
Adnan ShahidIDLab, Department of Information Technology, Ghent University-imec, Technologiepark-Zwijnaarde 126, B-9052 Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1943-6261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Putting sensors on the bodies of animals to automate animal activity recognition and gain insight into their behaviors can help improve their living conditions. Although previous hard-coded algorithms failed to classify complex time series obtained from accelerometer data, recent advances in deep learning have improved the task of animal activity recognition for the better. However, a comparative analysis of the generalizing capabilities of various models in combination with different input types has yet to be addressed. This study experimented with two techniques for transforming the segmented accelerometer data to make them more orientation-independent. The methods included calculating the magnitude of the three-axis accelerometer vector and calculating the Discrete Fourier Transform for both sets of three-axis data as the vector magnitude. Three different deep learning models were trained on this data: a Multilayer Perceptron, a Convolutional Neural Network, and an ensemble merging both called a hybrid Convolutional Neural Network. Besides mixed cross-validation, every model and input type combination was assessed on a goat-wise leave-one-out cross-validation set to evaluate its generalizing capability. Using orientation-independent data transformations gave promising results. A hybrid Convolutional Neural Network with L2-norm as the input combined the higher classification accuracy of a Convolutional Neural Network with the lower standard deviation of a Multilayer Perceptron. Most of the misclassifications occurred for behaviors that display similar accelerometer traces and minority classes, which could be improved in future work by assembling larger and more balanced datasets.

Indexed as

accelerometeranimal monitoringbehavior classificationconvolutional neural networkgoatsmachine learningtime series

Identifiers

PMID38998089
PMCPMC11240644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.