Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38998087›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Survey on Psychosocial Conditions of Official Veterinarians in Germany: Comparison with Other Professions and Differences between Age Groups, Gender, and Workplace Characteristics.

Katharina Charlotte Jensen, Roswitha Merle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katharina Charlotte JensenInstitute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Veterinary Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4656-4464
Roswitha MerleInstitute of Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Center for Veterinary Public Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, 14163 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8688-2926

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven though the mental health of veterinarians has raised concerns, little is known about the wellbeing of official veterinarians ensuring animal welfare, food safety, and control of infectious diseases and performing other tasks for veterinary public health. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the psychosocial conditions of official German veterinarians and to compare them with those of other employees.

methodsAn online survey was conducted including 82 items of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) and additional questions on workplace and demographics.

resultsThe answers of 838 respondents were analyzed, representing 26% of the target population. The average values for the dimensions

conclusionsOfficial veterinarians frequently experience offensive behavior and high-level demands. Therefore, measures to support and protect official veterinarians are needed. The positive aspects of this job should be emphasized to recruit and retain veterinarians in this field of the profession.

Indexed as

COPSOQ IIIjob satisfactionmental healthOne Healthpsychosocial conditionssurveyveterinary authoritieswelfare controlswellbeing

Identifiers

PMID38998087
PMCPMC11240587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.