Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38998018›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2024

Effect on Feeding Behaviour and Growing of Being a Dominant or Subordinate Growing Pig and Its Relationship with the Faecal Microbiota.

Juan Ochoteco-Asensio, Gustavo Zigovski, Leandro Batista Costa, Raquel Rio-López, Adrià Clavell-Sansalvador, Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas, Antoni Dalmau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juan Ochoteco-AsensioAnimal Welfare Program and Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agrifood and Technology (IRTA), Veïnat de Sies s/n, 17121 Monells, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2704-3986
Gustavo ZigovskiGraduate Program of Animal Science, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Paraná-PUCPR, Curitibia 80215-901, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1887-9810
Leandro Batista CostaGraduate Program of Animal Science, Pontificia Universidade Católica do Paraná-PUCPR, Curitibia 80215-901, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1852-4860
Raquel Rio-LópezAnimal Welfare Program and Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agrifood and Technology (IRTA), Veïnat de Sies s/n, 17121 Monells, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-6699-6486
Adrià Clavell-SansalvadorAnimal Welfare Program and Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agrifood and Technology (IRTA), Veïnat de Sies s/n, 17121 Monells, Spain.
Yuliaxis Ramayo-CaldasAnimal Welfare Program and Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agrifood and Technology (IRTA), Veïnat de Sies s/n, 17121 Monells, Spain.
Antoni DalmauAnimal Welfare Program and Animal Breeding and Genetics Program, Institute of Agrifood and Technology (IRTA), Veïnat de Sies s/n, 17121 Monells, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2248-6796

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades PDC2021-1211269-100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pigs are a social species, and they establish hierarchies for better use of resources and to reduce conflicts. However, in pig production, the opportunities for growth can differ between dominant and subordinate animals. In the present study, a system was tested to perform a dominant versus subordinate test in growing pigs to investigate how the hierarchy affects feeding behaviour, growth, and gut microbiota assessed in faeces. Sixty-four animals housed in eight different pens were used, with four castrated males and four females in each one, weighing 18 kg at arrival and maintained during the whole growing period, until 140 kg. Three stool samples were obtained from the animals directly from the anus to avoid contamination of the faeces 58, 100, and 133 days after the start of the study to investigate the microbiota composition. The dominant animals had higher gains during the growing period than the subordinates. In addition, they were performing more visits to the feeder throughout the day. Differential abundance patterns were observed in five bacterial genera, with

Indexed as

animal behaviouranimal welfaredominancegut microbiotasubordinateswine

Identifiers

PMID38998018
PMCPMC11240813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.